Laserfiche WebLink
· CONSIDER SETTLEMENT OF MINING AND GRADING VIOLATION <br /> By: Steven J. Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />In the fall of 2000, two property owners residing at 8981 and 8991 - 160th Lane undertook the <br />excavation of a man made pond located in their rear yards. The spoil material from this pond <br />enhancement was placed on the northerly bank of the pond. City code requires a mining and <br />grading permit for any excavation exceeding more than three feet in depth, fill greater than two <br />feet in height, or moving more than 400 cubic yards. This excavation greatly exceeded all these <br />threshold parameters. The excavation was done without the required permit, and the spoil <br />placement was objectionable to a number of neighboring properties. In addition, this spoil <br />material was placed up to forty feet beyond property line onto an outlot owned by Northfork, Inc. <br />This spoil matbrial as it currently exists is objectionable to Northfork Inc. <br /> <br />Rather than prosecute the ordinance violation, it was suggested that the residents apply for a <br />condition use permit for the mining and grading that occurred. The plan which was submitted by <br />the property owners essentially represented the post excavation conditions. This was found <br />unacceptable by the Planning Commission which recommended a denial action to the City <br />Council. The City Council tabled action on this in November 2001 to allow to facilitate an <br />acceptable solution to this issue. Staff advised the property owners in April that Northfork was <br />agreeable to allowing the use of the 80 foot wide outlot for spreading out the volume of the <br />material to reduce the steep slopes of the spoil, which was one of the chief objections to the <br />existing conditions. <br /> <br />After the City requested on several occasions that the property owner declare this intent to the <br />resolution of this issue, a letter was sent by the City Attorney's office declaring the City's intent <br />to pursue a criminal trespass complaint. On May 7, 2003 the property owners submitted a <br />grading plan which substantially conforms to that suggested in April 2002 in that it utilizes the <br />area of the outlot to reduce the slope of the spoil material to a maximum of 12%, which is cited <br />in the mining and grading ordinance. The submittal provides little additional detail. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff recommends the City enter into an agreement with the property owners as an alternative to <br />pursuing legal action. The elements which should be included in this agreement is as follows: <br /> i . <br /> (1) The following survey work shall be performed prior to any construction the north <br /> line of outlot B shall be stated along with the easterly line of the Jacobs property <br /> and the westerly line of the Van Norman property. A benchmark shall be <br /> established within 100 feet of the existing spoil pile, outside the proposed grading <br /> limits. <br /> (2) Silt fence shall be placed five feet inside the boundaries of the grading area which <br /> shall be defined as (a) the northern boundary of Outlot B on the north; (b) the <br /> <br />-237- <br /> <br /> <br />