Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> <br />Comment 9.1: Regarding stormwater runoff, the AUAR states that the RTC will require <br />a stormwater outlet to the Mississippi River. item 8, question-$ (page 8-6) states that a <br />discharge path has not },et been identified and that permitting by the DNR will be <br />required ~br future discharge to the River. We encourage the City of Ramsey to work <br />closely with the DNR and other relevant agencies in the design of the RTC stormwater <br />management system. Tables 17.1, 17.2 and 17.3 suggest significant increases in <br />stormwater runoff from existing conditions during the 100-year rainfall and snowmelt <br />events, for both the minimum and maximum projected runoff condition. We encourage <br />mini m ization of runoff to the greatest extent possible and adherence to the Mississippi <br />River Critical Area standards, as well as those of the MNRRA CMP. <br /> <br />Response: As stated in previous responses to Comments #3, 7.3 and 7.13, the details on <br />runoff minimization BMPs will be an element of design as the project develops. The <br />City is currently working with the County to determine the ronte and character of the <br />ultimate River discharge. Once these items are determined, the City can begin to work in <br />earnest with the regulatory agencies to define the protection needed. <br /> <br />Comment 9.2: The issue ora potential river crossing is also raised in the discussion on <br />trafl'~c in Item 21 of the AUAR. While decisions regarding a future bridge crossing will <br />be made through the transportation planning process, the development of a town center <br />could influence decisions for a new River bridge. In its plans for the RTC, we urge the <br />City to carefully consider the potential impacts of any future crossing on the River <br />corridor and on existing and proposed parks and open space on both sides of the river. <br /> <br />Response: MMA response expe6ted <br /> <br />Comment 9.3: The NPS also encourages the creation of continuous greenway corridors <br />to, and along, the Mississippi River where possible, and promotes COlmections to the <br />regional trail system, including access to the River. We also urge consideration of visual <br />impacts on the river corridor of any tall structures planned within the RTC boundary, <br />such as new elevated reservoir or conm~unications towers. <br /> <br />Response: The AUAR. identified the desire of the City and the RTC developer to connect <br />the new IUI"C to the River trail via a Colmection along the drainage corridor. This <br />connection would provide an opportunity for new residents and visitors to the RTC to <br />wall< to the River trail. The issue of visual impacts is addressed in Itern 2(; and in the <br />response to Comment//8.1 $. The City acknowledges the comment on tall structures and <br />will work with the developer to address this concern during site and building design. <br /> <br />Comment 9.4: The MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP) provides NPS <br />land use and protection guidelines for the Mississippi River corridor. Policies of <br />particular relevance too RTC planning are as follows: <br /> <br />Policy 2, pare 13: Reduce runoff through coordinated ~fforts of state and local <br />agencies to update development and enforcement standards for major new <br /> <br />34-19 <br /> <br />-167- <br /> <br /> <br />