Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson McDilda stated this is an important piece of information to tuck away <br />regarding the comprehensive plan. He stated there are elements that may have <br />implication for planning He stated that the primary objective is preservation of what the <br />city already has, rather than replace it once it's gone. <br />Mr. Nicholson stated that the MLCCS will tell roughly what the city has. He stated that <br />ground truthing is not always 100% accurate but it is a start. <br />Case #2: Wetlands Functions & Values Study Results Presentation <br />Chairperson McDilda welcomed Mr. Ron Peterson. Mr. Peterson introduced Ms. Allison <br />Kampbell, a staff member at Westwood Professional Services. <br />Ms. Kampbell provided EPB members with maps and summary tables of all the field data <br />that was found. <br />Mr. Peterson stated the process began by attempting to apply MNRAM 3.0 to the <br />wetlands in the city, as much as possible, using GIS techniques. <br />Ms. Kampbell explained that the first map covers all the wetlands that were field verified <br />and their classifications. She provided another map covering all the total NWI wetlands, <br />with the addition of the field verified wetlands. She explained the numbering system for <br />each wetland as being the county code, township, range, section, and unique letter for <br />each wetland within each section. <br />Ms. Kampbell explained that the rest of the maps were broken down by all the MNRAM <br />classifications such as shoreline, fishery habitat, aesthetics, recreation, education, flood <br />stormwater, wetland water quality, wildlife habitat, and vegetative diversity and integrity. <br />She stated it gives each of the functional values. <br />Board Member Freeburg arrived at 7:28 p.m. <br />Board Member Bentz asked where the data for the wetland water quality came from. <br />Ms. Kampbell stated that had to do with adjacent land use, whether there was a buffer <br />adjacent to a wetland, how large the vegetative natural buffer was, or whether it's <br />impervious surface adjacent the wetland. Ms. Kampbell stated the questions that dealt <br />with wetland water quality were the soil conditions of the wetlands, sediment delivery, <br />the buffer, management of the adjacent area, if there was any nutrient loading which can <br />be evidence of algae found in the wetland. <br />Coordinator Anderson asked Mr. Peterson if this study was comparable to studies that <br />were done in other communities in terms of water quality. He asked if this came as a <br />surprise considering the water quality and the fact that a lot of the northern part of the <br />city is undeveloped. <br />Environmental Policy Board/ December 4, 2006 <br />Page 8of19 <br />