Laserfiche WebLink
<br />authorize new hires; he thinks the economy is in a downturn and he does not believe now is the <br />time to do this. He is not opposed to looking at it in the future. He does not think it is good <br />timing with the economy downturn and perhaps some of their employees not going out on <br />inspections. He understands this is a different position. There is a definite slowdown from his <br />perspective in building and engineering and that type of thing. For that reason he is opposed to <br />this at this point. Councilmember Elvig stated he is not a real fan of adding staff unless it is <br />absolutely necessary. That being said, sitting on the Public Works Committee he has a close feel <br />for what is going on in Public Works and Engineering, and some of the stumbling blocks, and <br />where opportunities are. He does not see this tied with the slowdown of the economy. They are <br />doing a lot of improvements in the City, including County roads, City roads, water treatment <br />wells, sewer, and water. This person can be part of that and can earn revenue from that. He <br />imagines a good $600,000 to $1,000,000 is spent on outside consultants for engineering; that <br />money is being spent. In business if you cannot afford the tool today you subcontract until you <br />build enough business to do it in-house. In-house they have the control and the synergy of the <br />people. He supports this move with more supervision in-house and more control, taking out the <br />cost of subcontracting and bringing it in-house. Eight direct reports and sixteen under-reports is <br />too much for one person to supervise. He would support moving forward on this. <br />Councilmember Look stated he agrees with regard to Councilmember Elvig's statements about <br />business, but does not know that he agrees with regards to government comparisons. He finds in <br />many things government is proven to be inefficient. The City is looking at bringing in billing <br />from Connexus where they have one employee doing the job and the City is looking at 1 112 <br />employees. From that standpoint he does not know that government is always effective in these <br />types of hires. His concern is that they are hiring today for growth tomorrow. He has to agree <br />with Councilmember Dehen that he does not think the growth is necessarily happening at what <br />they are hoping. He does not know that they have proven the fire on this yet. He would not <br />support this. Councilmember Olson stated she would support this. She knows the engineering <br />staff has worked short handed for at least the last year. She would not support it if there were a <br />true downturn in the economy, but the only downturn is in the real estate sector; the economy is <br />not experiencing a downturn. They need to make sure there are enough people on the <br />engineering staff to get the job done, and the only way they will do it is if they hire another <br />person. Councilmember Elvig stated he appreciates Councilmember Look's position on this. He <br />has not met a manager that did not need more money, tools and staff, and you hold back as hard <br />and as fast as you can. However, a good portion ofthis position is revenue generating. To him it <br />is not a taxpayer issue as much as whether they need the position or not. Councilmember <br />Strommen stated one of the things that persuaded her on this is the ability to reduce consultant <br />hours and bring some of those in-house. The Council spends a lot of time talking about how <br />they bid consultants and the process. It would be a lot simpler if they could handle some of these <br />activities in-house. She cons~ders that, along with all the other projects the City has, and that this <br />is an engineering position, where she does not think engineering is as tied to growth as other <br />positions. Councilmember Dehen stated if they are truly understaffed as they claim, he would <br />ask why they are subsidizing some of their workers to leave their jobs and paying them a wage <br />for half the time they are with Habitat for Humanity. He finds some inconsistencies. He would <br />support reducing some of the City's consultant fees, but is not quite buying the argument that <br />they are understaffed and need more help when they are sending people out to work part time on <br />the City's dime. Public Works Director Olson stated no engineering staff has volunteered for <br />Habitat for Humanity at this time. Councilmember Dehen stated the Habitat for Humanity <br /> <br />City Council / June 12, 2007 <br />Page 26 of 29 <br />