Laserfiche WebLink
Case #3: Adopt Ordinance Extending Cable Franchise <br /> <br />City Administrator Schroeder reported that this is the second reading of an ordinance extending the <br />cable franchise to September 1998. It was introduced at the January 28, 1997 meeting, and is <br />available for adoption at tonight's meeting. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to adopt <br />Ordinance ~97-02 amending the Cable Franchise Ordinance. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed by the Recording Secretary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer aye <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen aye <br />Councilmember Zimmerman aye <br />Councilmember Beahen aye <br />Mayor Gamec aye <br /> <br />Motion carded. <br /> <br />Case #4: Report from Road and Bridge Committee <br /> <br />1) Update of Wellhead Protection Joint Powers Agreement <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski reported that the City had a joint powers agreement with Anoka County <br />to investigate the cost of performing a county-wide wellhead protection plan. The cost to Ramsey <br />would have been 4.89 percent of the total cost of between $100,000 and $200,000. The Anoka <br />County Municipal Wellhead Planning Group met on January 23 to review statements of <br />qualification by consultants. At that meeting, we were informed by the Minnesota Department of <br />Health that they would offer the resources of their organization in preparing the plan, as a result of <br />funding that was made available to their agency the Safe Drinking Water Act re-authorization, the <br />Planning Group accepted their offer. They are asking that Council pass a motion to acknowledge <br />that the joint powers agreement that we entered into be eliminated and that we discontinue the <br />Phase I consultant selection process and authorize commencement of Phase II work set forth in <br />parts 1, 2, and 3 of the Minnesota Department of Health proposal at zero cost to the City of <br />Ramsey. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen stated that the first, second and third steps at no cost to the City is <br />good. The fourth part gets "iffy". She asked if this issue could be revisited again and does this <br />have to do with municipal wells. In cities where there are landfills, you get into difficulties with <br />where you can "sink a well". She wondered why step four is so vague about the well and the cost <br />to us. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski replied the "nuts and bolts" of this is to model the groundwater system and to <br />delineate the area that recharges to each well. The fourth step the management implementations <br />section where the City determines what type of management techniques it will use to protect its <br />recharge area. One of the management techniques could be zoning. The City maybe would not <br />allow certain establishments to locate in these areas or maybe put more stringent requirements on <br />them. For example, a dry cleaners. We may require periodic well testing, etc. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Haas Steffen and seconded by Councilmember Zimmerman to ratify the <br />joint powers agreement recommendation to discontinue the Phase I consultant selection process <br />and authorize commencement of Phase II work set forth in parts 1, 2, and 3 of the Minnesota <br />Department of Health proposal at zero cost to the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />City Council/February 11, 1997 <br /> Page 6 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />