Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ties or intensities as proposed until a final <br />development plan is submittE!d and <br />approved for all or a portion of the. area cov- <br />ered by the concept plan. (Adapted from <br />Madison, Wisconsin) <br /> <br />This provision includes two alternatives. <br />If the bracketed language is included, the <br />rezoning and concept plan are approved at <br />the same time. If the bracketed language is <br />omitted, there will have been a prior adoption <br />of a rezoning for a planned unit development <br />district and only the approval ofthe concept <br />plan will be necessary at this stage. This provi- <br />sion also makes it clear that the concept plan <br />adoption establishes the basic uses, densi- <br />ties,and intensities, but that a final develop- <br />ment plan must be approved before the devel- <br />opment can go forward. <br />Preliminary development plan. The <br />development plan is a detailed plan of devel- <br />opment equivalent to a site plan and m'ust <br />have enough detail to serve as the regulations <br />that apply to the planned unit development. <br />In some jurisdictions this is known as a regu- <br />lating plan. If the planned unit development <br />district is an overlay district, the text and map <br />ofthe development plan must be carefully cor- <br />related with the provisions ofthe underlying <br />district. The development plan must also be <br />detailed enough to provide what is 1m own as <br />an "entitlement," which is a vesting ofthe <br />.uses, densities, and other elements of the <br />project that are included in the plan. Vesting <br />can be handled through a development agree- <br />ment or a vesting statute or ordinance, and is <br />discussed below. <br />The preliminary development plan is <br />preliminary only in that it is the first step in <br />the approval of a plan for the planned unit <br />development. If a concept plan has been <br />approved, the planning commission usually <br />has the responsibility of approving the pre- <br />liminary development plan. If not, the leg- <br />islative body approves the preliminary <br />development plan and may approve it at the <br />same time it approves the rezoning for the <br />planned unit development. The second step <br />is the approval of the final development <br />plan, which the planning commission <br />approves if it conforms substantially to the <br />approved preliminary development plan. <br />)his is a two-step procedure that is bor- <br />rowed from the subdivision ordinance. If the <br />planned unit development, like a master <br />planned community, is to be developed in <br />phases, it may be necessary to adopt a <br /> <br />120 <br /> <br />development plan for each phase of the <br />development that implements the project <br />development plan in more detaiL <br />Integration with the subdivision ordi- <br />nance is another critical issue in the review <br />of the preliminary plan. Subdivision <br />approval requires detailed platting and <br />engineering for streets and other public <br />facilities that may not be possible or desir- <br />able at the development plan stage, espe- <br />cially when the development will be built in <br />phases. For this reason, most ordinances do <br />not require planned unit development plans <br />to have this information, and coordination <br />with subdivision approval is necessary_ <br />For all these reasons, the preliminary <br />development plan is a critical document. It <br />must include, in detail, information on all of <br /> <br />requirement that adequate public facilities be <br />available. These may be handled by separate <br />ordinances or may be specified in the planned <br />unit development ordinance. In either case, <br />the preliminary development plan should con- <br />tain information about these programs if they <br />apply. <br />Master development plan followed by <br />site plan. The preliminary development plan, <br />once approved, is followed by a final develop- <br />ment plan that is approved if it is in substan- <br />tial compliance with the preliminary develop- <br />ment plan. For large developments, such as <br />master planned communities that will be <br />developed in phases, It is necessary to pro- <br />vide for a master development plan followed <br />by more detailed site plans for each stage. <br />This technique substitutes the master devel- <br /> <br /> <br />the requirements in the planned unit develop- <br />ment ordinance. It must also include informa- <br />tion on requirements included in other ordi- <br />nances, such as a landscaping ordinance, if <br />this ordinance is the basis for landscaping in <br />planned unit developments. Once approved, <br />it becomes the regulatory plan for the devel- <br />opment. <br />The ordinance may include other <br />requirements, such as an affordable housing <br />jobs/housing balance, .for which information <br />should be included in the preliminary devel- <br />opment plan. There may also be other pro- <br />grams that apply to planned unit develop- <br />ments, such as a transfer of development <br />rights program for natural resource areas, or a <br /> <br />opment plan for a concept pian, and splits <br />project details.between the master develop- <br />ment plan and site plans. They take the place <br />of a final development plan for the entire proj- <br />ect, and are approved if they are in substan- <br />tial compliance with the master development <br />plan. <br />The specific plan. Arizona and California <br />authorize by statute the adoption of a "spe- <br />cific plan" that many communities use as a <br />substitute for a project development plan. In <br />California, the specific plan and other zoning <br />actions for planned unit developments must <br />also go through the environmental review pro- <br />cedures required by the California Environ- <br />mental Quality Act. <br /> <br />ZONiNGPRACT1CE 6.07 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I page 4 <br />