Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Some municipalities wRere specific plans <br />are authorized have regulations providing for <br />the preparation and adoption of a specific plan <br />for planned unit developments. Since the spe- <br />cific plan is the equivalent of the development <br />plan, the ordinance can provide that uses, site <br />development requirements, and densities are <br />governed by the specific plan. <br /> <br />PROCEDURES FOR THE REViEW OF <br />DEVELOPMENT ?LAN APPLlCA7l0NS <br />Under some ordinances the legislative body <br />adopts a rezoning for a planned unit develop- <br />ment district and also approves the develop- <br />ment plan, either at the time of rezoning or <br />later. Alternatively, the decision whether to <br />approve the development plan is usually <br />given to the planning commission. This deci- <br /> <br />The completeness determination. The <br />ordinance should contain a requirement for <br />a completeness determination so that the <br />local government at some point must accept <br />an application as complete, and so the <br />applicant will be given direction on what is <br />required if the application is rejected as <br />incomplete. A completeness requirement is <br />especially important for planned unit devel- <br />opments, which may need to meet complex <br />regulatory requirements. <br />Notice and hearing. A decision on a <br />planned unit development application is <br />made following a record hearing held after <br />published notice. There may be a statement in <br />the notice that a record hearing will be held, <br />for example. The hearing notice may also do <br />the following: <br /> <br /> <br />sion is made in a quasi-judicial process that <br />requires a noticed public hearing, findings of <br />fact, and a written decision. Because a review <br />process of this type is .needed for all develop- <br />ment applications, its inclusion elsewhere in <br />the zoning ordinance is preferable, and the <br />planned unit development ordinance can <br />cross~reference to it. If the local government <br />has a unified development code that includes <br />a provision for planned unit developments, <br />the review process..will be part of that code. <br />Some planned unit development ordinances <br />contain their own review procedures for <br />development plan applications, and this sec. <br />tion discusses the elements that should be <br />part of those procedures. <br /> <br />. List the land development regulations <br />and goals, policies, and guidelines of the <br />local comprehensive plan that apply to the <br />application. <br />. State that a failure to raise an issue at a <br />record hearing-in person, or by letter-or <br />the failure to provide statements or evi- <br />dence sufficiellt to afford the local govern- <br />ment an opportunity to respond to the issue <br />precludes an appeal to the appeals board <br />based on that issue, unless the issue could <br />not have been reasonably known by any <br />party to the record hearing at the time of <br />the record hearing. <br />. State that a copy of any staff reports on the <br />application will be available for inspection at <br /> <br />no cost at least [seven] days prior to the record <br />hearing, and will be provided at actual cost. <br />Findings and decision. Adequate find. <br />ings are very important, especially for a devel- <br />opment that can be as complex as a planned <br />unit development, <br />The planned unit development ordinance <br />can also state what action an applicant must <br />take if an application for a planned u,nit devel- <br />opment permit is conditionally approved: <br /> <br />If an application for the approval of a pre- <br />liminary development plan is conditionally <br />approved, the applicant shall have 90 days <br />from the date of planning commission <br />action granting conditional approval to sub- <br />mit a revised application to the planning <br />staff. If the planning staff determines that <br />the revised application complies with the <br />conditional approval, it shall forward it to <br />the planning commission for a public <br />hearing, <br /> <br />TIme limits. A requirement for timely <br />decisions as well as the requirementfor a <br />completeness decision should minimize the <br />delays that can occur in decision making and <br />that can create difficulties in the approval <br />process for planned unit developments. <br />Anal development plan. Once the prelimi- <br />nary development plan is approved, the appli- <br />cant will submit a final development plan to the <br />planning commission for approval. The purpose <br />of reviewing the final plan is to ensure it <br />includes all the approved elements of the pre- <br />liminary development plan, and that no sub- <br />stantial changes have been made. Approval can <br />be by the planning commission unless there <br />have been substantial changes, which the ordi- <br />nance can spell out. A public hearing is required <br />on the approval of the final plan, and is also <br />required if a revised final development plan is <br />submitted after disapproval. <br />The jurisdiction can issue building per. <br />mits and a certificate of occupancy once it <br />approves the final development plan. <br />Coordination with subdivision regula- <br />tions. If a planned unit development <br />requires the subdivision of land, which is <br />likely.in many instances, it will also require <br />review under the subdivision ordinance. <br />Coordinating these reviews can be difficult. <br />Coordination at the concept plan stage is <br />not possible because the concept plan does <br />not include enough detail to allow a review <br />of compliance with the subdivision ordi- <br />nance. Coordination is also difficult even at <br />the preliminary development plan stage <br /> <br />ZONING PRACTlCE 6.07 <br />AMERICAN PL~NNING ASSOCIATION 1D21 <br />