Agenda - Council - 07/24/2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Further discussion: Commissioner Brauer inquired about requiring a traffic study. Chairperson Nixt noted a traffic study might give them an answer that imposes obligations on someone other than the applicant. Commissioner Trites Rolle suggested that the traffic study may not be part of this particular case of adding the deli. City Engineer Jankowski advised he thinks this will be a rather unique type of deli. If the clientele is geared more towards the parents of children in the daycare and the neighborhood, he thinks it will be a much lower traffic generation rate than a standard commercial deli. Request for Site Plan Revie Expansion; Case of Carol Lublin Trites Rolle, Brauer, and Absent: Commissioner Motion carried. V oting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commis Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Abstain: Cleveland. Case #3: Services Associate Planner Geisler stated the site plan fi proposing to construct a 4,434-square foot addition onto ili about 6,650 square feet in size. The subje is appro located in the R-l Residential: Rural Dev e additl proposed to be used for a new daycare facility and a new deli was evaluated according to B-1 Business District zoning standards, as k requirements called out in the existing CUP. The site plan is mee ts. Ms. Geisler stated with the expansion, building coverage on ite b eet or 5%; the B-1 District allows up to 35%. The CUP also allo g exp ootprint of22,000 square feet. City Code requires one parking s each 300 office use, and one space for each 3 restaurant seats. This wo a need for g spaces. The existing parking lot is sizable, and accommodate spaces easily. The eastern portion of the lot is starting to deteriorate; ecomme the unused portion of the lot be removed and sod installe mmen remaining parking area receive an overlay. Ms. Geisl ently ss from 157th Lane; a second unused and gated ane. xisting building material consists of brick. The ombination of brick and 1/4 log siding. Both materials are ing and drainage plan has been prepared for the site, but very ucted in conjunction with the building expansion. The wed and is acceptable. Ms. Geisler advised staff is e plan, contingent on compliance with the City Staff Review e applicant has any questions or concerns regarding the staff review letter dated July 3, 7, particularly regarding bituminous requirements and upgrading requirements of sewer and water for sprinkling. Ms. Lublin stated her understanding is that the City would like them to remove part of the bituminous, which they can do and put in grass. Chairperson Nixt requested information regarding the calculation for parking requirements. -162-