Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9. That the Applicant has stated that the request for variance is the minimum amount needed to <br />minimize the proximity of the compound to the park uses/soccer fields. <br /> <br />10. That the City finds it in its best interest to locate the tower as far to the south as possible. <br /> <br />11. That if granted, the variance will not permit a use that is prohibited in the Public-Quasi <br />Public zoning district. <br /> <br />12. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br />property . <br /> <br />13. That if granted, the variance will not endanger the public safety. <br /> <br />14. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values III the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />15. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />16. That, if granted, the variance will grant the Applicant any special privileges that are denied to <br />other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />17. That undue hardship will result if the variance request is denied due to the existence of <br />special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land and which are not <br />applicable to other lands in the same district. <br /> <br />18. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member <br />Trites Rolle, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Chairperson Van Scoy <br />Board Member Nixt <br />Board Member Trites Rolle <br />Board Member Brauer <br />Board Member Cleveland <br />Board Member Hunt <br />Board Member Levine <br /> <br />and the following voted against: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #07-06-132 <br />Page 2 of3 <br />