My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 07/31/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2007
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 07/31/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:45:48 PM
Creation date
8/16/2007 8:18:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
07/31/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilmember Look stated he thinks the recreation coordinator position is a luxury. As <br />property values go up in future years they should look at that position, but he finds it difficult to <br />add additional staff during a time when it is as flat as it is. Regarding the police officer position, <br />he inquired ifthe officer to population ratio is 1 per 1,000. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way replied that is the general ratio that is discussed. He would rather that be one <br />factor along with other things, such as calls for service. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look asked how many patrol officers the City currently has. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way replied there are 15 officers, and they also need to do administrative things; <br />the number of sworn personnel is at 22. If they look at the 1 per 1,000 ratio, the Ramsey <br />population is about 22,050. The Stanton book recommends factoring in many things such as <br />whether there is a high school in the City, the daytime population, whether there is a highway in <br />the City, etc. The metro average ratio is 1.3 total officers per 1,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig commented one thing that convinced him to add officers the last few years <br />was that they could not muster enough inertia and overlap to get more than one officer on at <br />night with union requirements. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way indicated current staffing consists of two officers at night and three in the <br />afternoon. On July 1,2007 they went to three officers in the afternoon, then an officer was hurt <br />and they are now paying overtime to cover the third officer position. He stated he is okay with <br />eliminating the request for the patrol officer position. However, it should be known that he <br />originally requested two officers, and next year he will be back requesting the officer. They will <br />not be able to do a lot of extra things, and there will need to be a price for things like the special <br />events and special requests that are received. <br /> <br />There was additional discussion of the police officer position that included the following topics: <br />· The cost of an officer related to crime prevention: currently the City's Police Department <br />is reactive rather than proactive <br />· The use of community service officers and reserve officers <br />· Additional work load that will result from the newly adopted abatement ordinance <br />· Overtime will always be a cost; it is not used to pay for vacations and holidays, but it is <br />necessary for coverage when an officer calls in sick and court time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated this is a $10 million budget and they are discussing 1.3% of the <br />budget. He finds it difficult to believe there is not 1.3% of flexibility in this budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he appreciates staff putting these reduction options forward. He has <br />been a non-advocate for hirjng all along, and this is a tough year. If the City is not growing and <br />the revenue is not growing he does not see how they can continue at the pace they are currently <br />at. Wages, health costs, fuel, the cost of living, everything is up. To maintain a flat rate or a <br />slightly reduced rate is a good shot and a good way to start this. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / July 31, 2007 <br />Page 11 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.