Laserfiche WebLink
<br />might regard as a leg up on another retailer, which was a major reason behind excluding retail <br />from the RLF guidelines. <br /> <br />Member Schindel asked if the City monitors the project to ensure that the loan is used for <br />improvements. Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney replied there is documentation; <br />the project is done before the City money is put in and receipts are provided. Typically the <br />senior lender in the deal would fund the entire amount and the City funds would be provided <br />after the project is done. <br /> <br />There was discussion of whether to request the owner of Cooper Bennett Flooring to make a <br />presentation on the loan request at an EDA meeting. <br /> <br />Consensus of the EDA was to direct Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney to represent <br />the best interest of the EDA. It was noted that the EDA would like to meet with the business <br />owner, but the meeting should not be afactor of the loan consideration. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan advised an approval on this should be contingent <br />on the financial analysis being satisfactory. <br /> <br />Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney indicated a prospective tenant has requested to <br />be in the facility by September 1 st and was informed that is not possible, not only as far as getting <br />the project done, but in obtaining the financing to move forward. It is likely necessary for <br />Cooper Bennett Flooring to have this completed one way or another by October 1st. He <br />recommended that the EDA could deem the Cooper Bennett Flooring project is eligible for the <br />Revolving Loan Fund and is willing to accept an application at this point in time for review. <br /> <br />Motion by Member LeTourneau, seconded by Member Schindel, that the EDA deems the <br />Cooper Bennett Flooring project is eligible for the Revolving Loan Fund and is willing to accept <br />an application at this point in time for review. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan inquired about the willingness <br />of the Board to hold a special meeting if necessary for the timing on the project. Member <br />Steffen inquired about the ability of the Board to review [mancials without holding a meeting. <br />Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney indicated emails could be sent to the members <br />with a credit write-up. Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan indicated a motion on an <br />agenda item would be necessary for the Board to act. The financial information could be <br />emailed with a short meeting held if necessary. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members LeTourneau, Schindel, and Steffen. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Members Elvig, Kiefer, and Strommen. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Staff Update <br /> <br />The EDA reviewed the Staff Update. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/August 9, 2007 <br />Page 8 of9 <br /> <br />8 <br />