My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 09/06/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2007
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 09/06/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 3:17:06 PM
Creation date
8/30/2007 3:11:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
09/06/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2 acres. Mr. Mulrooney stated Bennett Cooper Floors currently occupies all ofthe 10,500 square <br />foot building and approximately 4,000 square feet of the second 12,000 square foot warehouse <br />building. The owners of the company have expressed an interest in rehabbing the remaining <br />8,000 square feet of the warehouse building to make it available for lease to two additional <br />businesses that have expressed an interest in relocating and expanding to the City of Ramsey. <br />The owners are seeking to complete this project to improve the overall performance of Bennett <br />Cooper Floors. Mr. Mulrooney' reviewed the proposed improvements and related costs to <br />renovate the building, at an estimated cost of$139,000. <br /> <br />Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney stated staff was approached by this business due <br />to the fact that they are looking for financing to accomplish the rehab of this 12,000 square foot <br />building. Under the Ramsey Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) guidelines there is a cap of 40% ofthe <br />total project cost that the City can provide, which would be $56,000 on this project. The <br />remaining financing for the project would be provided by their bank. Mr. Mulrooney explained <br />this project involves a request from a company who is a wholesaler and limited retailer. In <br />February of 2005 the RLF guidelines were amended making retailers ineligible for RLF <br />proceeds. He advised this project also entails redevelopment of a commercial building, which is <br />one of the goals that the EDA has established for the fund. Mr. Mulrooney requested guidance <br />from the EDA regarding program eligibility for the loan request from Bennett Cooper Flooring. <br />He advised there are also issues from a planning standpoint regarding this project. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan indicated there are two buildings on this site. As it <br />currently stands the primary use is the carpet company and the accessory use is storage for the <br />carpet company. There are some issues to be worked out through the Planning Commission to <br />allow this, but it seems that there would be enough space for parking in order for the project to <br />occur. There is also the inability to utilize the RLF for retail businesses. However, at the <br />beginning of this year the EDA expanded commercial/retail to be incorporated in its scope. Staff <br />is looking for guidance on this loan request. Timing is important on this project. The owner <br />would like to get this going as soon as possible. <br /> <br />Staff and the Board discussed the following in relation to the RLF request from Cooper-Bennett <br />Flooring: <br />. Potential tenant uses would include service and retail <br />. Financial assistance from the RLF would be provided to Cooper Bennett Flooring as a <br />real estate redevelopment project, rather than to the retail tenants <br />. Implications from a tax base and job perspective with the warehouse conversion to a <br />multi-tenant facility <br />. Increase in the assessed value of the property <br />. Requirement for the business to have at least 10% vested in the project <br />. Consideration of amending the RLF guidelines to include retail <br /> <br />Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney advised the reason the RLF guidelines were <br />amended to exclude retail was to avoid being charged with giving someone in the retail sector a <br />competition advantage over another. It could be argued that this is a real estate development <br />project. No direct dollars would be going to fund inventory or things of that nature that someone <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/August 9, 2007 <br />Page 7 of9 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.