Laserfiche WebLink
/e~CASE # ~ <br /> <br />AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OF WELL NO. 4 <br /> By: Steven Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />With the addition of Well No. 3, the water utility will have more than doubled the volume of <br />water it can deliver from its two existing wells. In addition, an agreement with the City of <br />Anoka allows the utility to purchase another 1.0 million gallons per day to augment its well <br />production. However, the continued rapid growth of the utility warrants still additional well <br />development. It is common practice for a water utility to provide a combination of water supply <br />and storage such that the utility can meet its peak day demand with its largest single source out <br />of service. This is known as firm well capacity. Table 1 illustrates the utility supply capacity <br />and the systems firm well capacity with each source out of service. <br /> <br />In the summer of 1996, the utility experienced its peak water use day with a demand of 2.6 <br />million gallons on August 13, 1996. Observing Table 2, it can be seen that over the last six <br />years, the increases in annual consumption have ranged from 12 to 71 percent. Based upon these <br />past trends, I would expect a peak 1997 summer demand somewhere in the range of 20 to 60 <br />percent higher than last summer, or a peak summer demand of 3.12 to 4.16 million gallons per <br />day. Under the lower growth scenario, the loss of Well No. 1 or Well No. 3 would place the <br />utility in the position of being unable to meet its peak demand day, while under the higher <br />growth projection, the loss of any source would lead to this situation. <br /> <br />The need for an additional well was anticipated when the contract documents were prepared for <br />Well No. 3. A price of the drilling of Well No. 4 was set up as a separate schedule. The low bid <br />contractor, Alberg Well has a contract price of $81,455 for this work. However, the <br />authorization to proceed on this portion of the contract has not been issued. It is the project <br />engineer's opinion that this is a very competitive price, as is evidenced by the bid tabulation. <br />The engineer has also consulted with geohydrologists who have concluded that a similarly sized <br />well located to the north, west, or south, would not cause a directional change in groundwater <br />flow from the landfill and, that a well spaced approximately 1,000 feet from Welt No. 3 would <br />not interfere with its production capacity. The estimated cost for a functional, producing Well <br />No. 4 would be as follows: <br /> <br />Well No. 4 $81,455 <br />Pump, Vault, Controls 133,200 <br />Connecting Watermain 36,000 <br />Subtotal: 250,655 <br />Overhead ~25% 62,663 <br />TOTAL: $313,318 <br /> <br />It is proposed that Well No. 4 be sited on the Menkveld property, approximately 1,000 feet due <br />west of Well No. 3. The City is already negotiating with Mr. Menkveld for the purchase of this <br />property, and has a right of entry for siting a well. Access would be provided by the future <br /> <br /> <br />