Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Consensus of the Board was to direct staff to request that El Tinklenberg speak at the event if <br />Governor Pawlenty or Congressman Oberstar is not secured as a speaker by Friday, April 23rd, <br />with a preferred date for the event of May 22nd or May 2lh. <br /> <br />Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney commented that Mr. Tinklenberg has a former <br />transportation commissioner title, and he could also quell rumors about Highway 10. He <br />explained there was a company that was going to move to Ramsey but decided against it after <br />hearing that the interchange at Thurston would be going in and that the construction would cause <br />traffic problems. <br /> <br />The Board discussed the financing of the event as outlined in the case and shifting some of the <br />costs from the Ramsey Rotary to the Anoka County Partners. <br /> <br />Motion by Member Kiefer, seconded by Member Steffen, to direct staff to request that Anoka <br />County Partners pick up the cost of food and beverages for the 2007 Business Connection <br />Meeting, and that the cost of the invitations be split between the Ramsey Rotary and the Ramsey <br />EDA, with a preferred date for the event of May 22nd subject to the availability of speakers. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members Kiefer, Steffen, Elvig, and <br />LeTourneau. Voting No: None. Absent: Members Schindel and Steffen. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />167th and Hwy 47 Commercial Node <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan reviewed that in 2003 the EDA initiated a <br />redevelopment study for the 167th A venue/Hwy 47 Commercial Node. The study was completed <br />in July of 2003 and the findings showed that this area has the potential for business success. The <br />findings and recommendations from the Rum River Commercial Area Retail Market Analysis <br />done by the McComb Group are included in the Board's packet. Also included in the packet are <br />past cases. This case is meant to spark discussion about how the EDA should take care of <br />existing businesses and to identify ways to create a better business climate in the City. <br /> <br />Member Elvig stated his efforts have been to keep this commercial node alive; the people there <br />are very interested in keeping it alive. In the Ramsey3 planning process it has been discussed <br />that good planning includes planning neighborhoods with commercial areas nearby that can be <br />walked or biked to. More importantly he recently put out a survey to the business community <br />regarding the hiring of the new city administrator. The major comment that came back is that the <br />City works hard to chase new smokestacks and forgets about the existing businesses. There are <br />traffic concerns, access concerns, and a business environment that is local and ongoing and is <br />asking for more support from the City to existing businesses. He has also received phone calls <br />from that area saying they are struggling. He asked if there is anything they can do as a City to <br />help support the existing businesses in this commercial node. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Sullivan reviewed the findings and recommendations from <br />the Rum River Commercial Area Retail Market Analysis. He indicated the study was <br />contentious, but it came up with suggestions on how the commercial node could be improved. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/April 19, 2007 <br />Page 3 of7 <br />