My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/01/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/01/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:42:22 AM
Creation date
10/26/2007 3:05:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/01/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Dan Jacobs, 13740 Dolomite Street, stated that his property is directly behind this site' and would <br />welcome a Jiffy Lube before they would welcome the rental units that are proposed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig clarified that these are not rental units, but twin home units that will" sell <br />for $250,000 to $300,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Jacobs stated that with a Jiffy Lube, the City would have controls on the property that they <br />would not with the proposed use. He stated that Mr. Ho vious owner of Super Bowl <br />had a junkyard behind his property, but the new owner est neighbor imaginable. <br />He stated the neighbors are not turned off by the . 0 al business because they <br />understood that this property was zoned commer . n their property. <br /> <br /> <br />Rich W olens, 6726 13 7th Avenue, stated that h <br />has concerns about town homes, in general. <br />homes in the City that are supposec,l to' be $250,00 <br />$145,000 and rental signs are popping .up allover. <br />next to his property, that is about 11 feet from this <br />200 and 300 feet away from this property. <br />$1,000,000 and are some of the nicest h <br />development by these homes would be a <br />hoodwinked into allowing a triple X b <br />he is a former Spring Lake Park Co <br />were elected to do and listen to th pe <br />want this development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen ask <br />property and what the M <br /> <br />for the home being built south of the <br />IS. <br /> <br />. t is 90 feet ~de and the home is approximately 70 <br />f total frontage. <br /> <br />imp <br />the Ci <br />stated that <br />He stated that 1 <br />book store. He s <br />Work. <br /> <br />there were some assessments added to this property for <br />00. He stated that he understands this is not the problem of <br />sidents have stated that they do not want this proposal. He <br />I what type of commercial use would move onto the property. <br />g from a bar/restaurant, to a Jiffy Lube, to potentially an adult <br />e City does not have full control and Places to Work is Places to <br /> <br />The residents spoke from their seats and noted that they would support anything but town homes <br />on this land. <br /> <br />City Council /October 9, 2007 <br />Page 10 of 25 <br /> <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.