My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/13/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 11/13/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:54:34 PM
Creation date
11/9/2007 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/13/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Dehen, Olson, Elvig, Jeffrey, <br />Look, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br />Case #4: AdoptOrdinance to Rezone Property from E-1 Employment to B-1 Business; <br />Case of TSM Development, Inc. <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated that this item is for the same project as Case #3, but a different <br />portion of the site. <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmcmt~er Jeffrey°, to adopt Ordinance #07- <br />16 to rezone the Subject Property from E-1 Employment to B-1 Business, contingent upon <br />Metropolitan Council approval of the applicant's Comprehensive plan"Amendment and final plat <br />approval. <br />A roll call vote was performed by Mayor Gamec. <br />Mayor Gamec: <br />Councilmember Dehen: <br />Councilmember Elvig: <br />Councilmember Jeffrey: <br />Councilmember Look: <br />Councilmember Olson: <br />Councilmember Strommen: <br />Motion carried. <br />aye <br />aye <br />aye <br />aye <br />aye <br />aye <br />aye <br />Case #5: Request for Cc,n~prchensive Plau :~nieudment, Case of Dan Murphy and Tim <br />-Halm <br />Associate Pla~uler Gcis]er noted th~lt Dan'_Vlurphy and Tim Holm have applied to rezone this <br />propert~~ from B-? Business to a Planned :['nit Development (PUD). She stated that they would <br />like to put in sip t~~'in hoil~e ~uiits. She noted ihat~the Planning Commission reviewed this plan at <br />their S epmmber 7, 2006 ~n~ eeii n ~ and recomuzended denial. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that if the zoning remains as is, a commercial business could come <br />a1~d clear aut all the trees so there would be no buffer for the residential area. <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated that there would be a buffer required even if this was developed <br />commerciall; . <br />Councilmember Dehen stat~;d that he has not been in favor of this change from the beginning and <br />feels residents would rathzr see businesses'on this land than town homes. He stated that he does <br />not see a compelling reason to cram three buildings onto this lot and change the comprehensive <br />plan. He stated that he received the message during his campaign that people do not want <br />anymore town homes. in the City. <br />City Council /October 9, 2007 <br />Page 8 of 25 <br />-304- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.