Laserfiche WebLink
may have to lose money on the deal because real estate is risky. He urged the City Council to <br />look at the rules that are in place and use them. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that if the City follows the current rules, there will be commercial <br />development on this property. <br />Mr. Nutter stated that he would like the property to be taken out of commercial use. <br />Councilmember Jeffrey asked about the front yard frontage for standard residential areas and the <br />Clemens Development. <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon state~~ that t~ picall~ the frontage is 80 feet, but in <br />the Mississippi River District it is 90 feet. 1-le stated that he belic~~es that there were some <br />variances granted in the Clemens Development. ~~ <br />Mr. Murphy stated that his proposed lots are 80, 80 and b~ feet, so he would ask f~~ra variance of <br />10 feet for two lots and 6 feet for the last lot. <br />Councilmember Look .asked the residents in attenda~ice if -the} ~l-oiild support a .low density <br />residential development. <br />The residents answered from their seats iliat rhe~~ «~ould support low density development. <br />~, <br />Motion by Councilmember Look seconded by Councilme~iibzr Elvig, to direct City staff to <br />begin the process of amending the. compxehensi~ e pl an to ;allow low density housing on the <br />subject property. ` <br />Further Discussion: City.--:~ttcn~l~;y Goodrich stated that the public hearing for this property was <br />held regarding medium density liousin:g, so a new public hearing would be needed to consider <br />the change to lo~~t~ density housin~~. He stated that he recommends tabling or denying action and- <br />move to«ard a public hearing for lo~~- densit~~llousing. <br />~, <br />Couiicilnle>.i~ber Elvig~,~,~ithdre«- his second aiid Councilmember Look withdrew his motion. <br />C:omniunity Development Director. Trudgeon stated that he strongly urged the City Council not <br />to table actin, but to make a decision to either support or deny the request. He stated that the <br />City could niti<~te land use discussions on their own; wait for the developer to make this request <br />or to look at this area through coii~prehensive plan discussions. <br />s <br />Councilmember Olson stated that the property owner could ask for a variance and divide this <br />parcel into three pieces and. the City Council would have no control over what went in. <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that a single family home does not come <br />before the City Council for site approval as long as they meet setback requirements. He stated. <br />that the Board of Adjustments and Planning Commission would take a look if there is a variance <br />requested. <br />City Council /October 9, 2007. <br />Page 13 of 25 <br />. ~ -309- <br />