Minutes - Council - 08/27/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember Zimmerman suggested that the other requests for temporary buildings had existing business buildings on the property and he feels this is different. He suggested that Mr. Johnson should bring in photos of what the temporary structure is proposed to look like. Relating to some questions posed by Terry Hendriksen during citizen input, Mr. Johnson stated he did not know why they didn't have to post a financial guarantee, but that he would be happy to do that if asked to do so. He stated he will build his buildings and the City will deed him the property, not the other way around. A draft of the parking lot will be available at City Hall tomorrow. He then inquired what Mr. Hendriksen meant by cost shifting. Terry Hendriksen, 15631 Ramsey Boulevard NW, Ramsey, stated that if he was in error on who will own the property, then he is even more concerned, because then Mr. Johnson will be operating a business on City property. He stated he thought Mr. Johnson would own all the property and then deed back to the City the Old Town Hall property. Mr. Hendriksen suggested that each time we review another area of the agreement, we find more concerns. With regard to cost-shifting, he compared it to "the fox guarding the hen house". There is no protection in the agreement for the City; no construction managers, no financial guarantees like other developments have had to place with the City, no protection for the City in terms of the Landmark State Bank realizing a benefit in which they are working full-time on the Old Town Hall and cutting a deal on the bank building. Landmark got a piece of property from the City that others would have been willing to pay more for and now they will be deciding how the citizens' money will be spent. Mr. Johnson responded that he is not controlling the money along with the general contractor. He did not hire the appraisal - the City did. It is not our intention to cut a deal and suggested that Mr.- Hendriksen is treading on soft ground. Ms. Frolik noted that waiving the financial guarantee on site plan development permits has been waived on numerous economic development projects for commercial development. Case #5: Adopt Proposed Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements that were Dedicated with AEC Energy Park, Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 3 City Administrator Schroeder reported that with the approval of the Vision-Ease Lens site plan and the reconfiguring of the easements dedicated within the AEC Energy Park, we need to vacate easements because of lot line reconfiguration. Currently AEC has dedicated the traditional 10 foot wide easement around Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 3 of the Energy Park. The Vision-Ease building is intended to cover all of the lots requiring that the City vacate the easements running along the current lot lines. These easements will be rededicated with the new lot configuration with the completion of the Vision-ease project. Council introduced an ordinance on August 13, 1996, vacating the drainage and utility easements. Such ordinance is now being presented for formal adoption. Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to adopt Ordinance g96-16 authorizing vacation of all drainage and utility easements contained within Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 3 AEC ENERGY PARK, Anoka County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. Roll call vote was performed by the Recording Secretary: Motion carded. Councilmember Beyer aye City Council/August 27, 1996 Page 11 of 17