Laserfiche WebLink
45) <br /> <br />46) <br /> <br />47) <br /> <br />48) <br /> <br />49) <br /> <br />Adopt Resolution #96-09-248 calling for a public hearing on proposed assessment for <br />Improvement Project/196-13 (Sealcoat and crack frill Bower's Drive) <br />Adopt Resolution//96-09-249 declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of <br />proposed assessment for Improvement Project//96-14 (Sealcoat and crack fill the East Half <br />of Sections 34 and 35, South of State Trunk Highway #10) <br />Adopt Resolution //96-09-250 calling for a public hearing on proposed assessment for <br />Improvement Project #96-14 (Sealcoat and crack fill the East Half of Sections 34 and 35, <br />South of State Trunk Highway #10) <br />Adopt Resolution//96-09-251 declaring cost to be assessed and ordering preparation of <br />proposed assessment for Improvement Project //96-15 (Sealcoat and crack fill 161st <br />Avenue West of Armstrong Boulevard) <br />Adopt Resolution//96-09-252 calling for a public heating on proposed assessment for <br />Improvement Project//96-15 (Sealcoat and crack fill 161st avenue West of Armstrong <br />Boulevard) <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beahen and Zimmerman. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Beyer. <br /> <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: <br /> <br />1997 Budget Discussion and Resolution Approving Proposed <br />Maximum 1997 Payable Tax Levy and Scheduling Budget Public <br />Hearing Dates <br /> <br />Finance Officer Hart stated that the 1997 budget was discussed on August 27, 1996. She <br />summarized the recommendations and explained that $1,592,019 is the minimum amount <br />necessary to balance the 1997 General Fund Budget. She explained the debt service levy and the <br />operating levies. In addition to the proposed "operating levies" is $79,680 in "special levies" <br />attributable to the most recent Charter amendment. This amount is the portion of the Haubrich <br />Addition sewer and water project that is anticipated to be "deferred" under the new Charter <br />provisions. Inclusion of this special levy causes a 4.97% increase in the proposed tax capacity <br />rate, bringing it to 21.2010. The minimum levy necessary to operate the budget as recommended <br />would be $1,602,421 and would result in an estimated tax capacity rate of 20.1968, comparable to <br />the 1996 rate. The resolution included in the case reflects a maximum levy of $1,682,101. This <br />includes the minimum dollars necessary to fund the General Fund budget as proposed and <br />provides "working" room for continuing budget discussions (i.e., funding the Haubrich Addition <br />sewer and water project) prior to actual adoption in December. The maximum proposed levy can <br />always be reduced, it cannot be increased without "higher" level approval through an appeals <br />process. It is staff's position that the maximum proposed levy be adopted at a level above what is <br />considered to be the minimum. The proposed maximum levy must be certified to Anoka County <br />by Monday, September 16, 1996. Staff recommends approval of the City of Ramsey's payable <br />1997 proposed maximum tax levy in the amount of $1,682,101 and to schedule the City of <br />Ramsey's initial budget public hearing on Wednesday, December 4, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. and a <br />reconvene date (if necessary) on Thursday, December 12, 1996. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to adopt Resolution <br />~)6-09-253 approving the Proposed Maximum 1996, Payable 1997, Tax Levy, and schedule the <br />public hearing dates as recommended by staff. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Terry Hendriksen quoted the number of $79,680 relating to the Haubrich <br />Addition and stated he is assuming the City is expecting to assess the Green's and the <br />Juskiewicz's. The difference in the feasibility study indicated it would be $98,000. The $9,000 is <br />for the watermain. It should be $89,440 according to the feasibility study. The actual amount you <br />should expect would be $86,933. The out-of-pocket expense would be a shortage of $2,500. The <br /> <br />City Council/September 9, 1996 <br /> Page 6 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />