Agenda - Charter Commission - 01/12/2007 - 2006 Annual Report

Home

January 12, 2007 The Honorable Gary R. Schurer Chief Judge Tenth Judicial District Washington County Court House nd 14949 – 62 Street N. – P.O. Box 6 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0006 Re: City of Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota, Charter Commission Annual Report Dear Judge Schurer: In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 410.05, the following is an annual report reflecting the activities of the City of Ramsey Charter Commission during the year 2006. Members of the Charter Commission for 2006 were as follows: Tim Vogt (Chair), Hannah LaMere (Vice Chair), Sandra Bertzyk, Benjamin Deemer, Lauri Ebel, Aimee Fischer, Frank Frederick, Steve Simenson and Brian Swanson. This Commission met on April 27, May 22, and December 5, 2006. At the April 27, 2006 meeting, the Commission entered into a discussion relating to public improvements and special assessments. Chapter 8 of the City’s Charter includes language relating to this subject. A portion of that chapter, approved in 1993, was designed to protect residents against being forced to hook up to City sewer and water, but the way it is worded and has been interpreted, is it is more a protection for the developers. It seemed that whoever developed a property first had to pay for all the improvements. The major concern with regard to improvements was the transportation improvements. The Commission requested the City Attorney draft language to show the actual intent of the Chapter which is to protect the City’s residents. The Commission also discussed the process of filling City Council vacancies should a vacancy occur between elections. It was determined that the Charter language needed to be amended so as to coincide with the seven-person Council and the ward system. The City Attorney will be drafting language to that effect for the Commission’s review. The Commission again discussed considering a Council-Manager form of Government. The Commission was informed that the City is in the process of an organizational study, and the feeling was that further discussion should come after the results of the organizational study are received.