My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/24/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2000
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/24/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:59:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 12:54:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
04/24/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br />ANOKA COUNTY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />The Ramsey City Council conducted a work session on Monday, April 24, 2000, at the Ramsey <br />Municipal Center, 15153 Nowthen Boulevard NW, Ramsey, Minnesota. <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Thomas Gamec <br />Councilmember Susan E. Anderson (arrived 6:20 p.m.) <br />Councilmember Margaret Connolly <br />Councilmember Terry Hendriksen <br />Councilmember Gerald Zimmerman <br /> <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />City Administrator James E. Norman <br />Assistant City Administrator Kim Moore-Sykes <br />Community Development Director Sylvia Frolik <br />City Planner Anita Rasmussen <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec called the work session to order at 5:34 p.m. <br /> <br />APPROVEAGENDA <br /> <br />Consensus was to approve the agenda as presented. <br /> <br />COUNCIL TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION <br /> <br />#1: Proposed Housing Development: Royal Oaks - Laws Property <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated, with regard to Royal Oaks, townhome density was a concern. <br />The developer was asked to come back with revised plans. <br /> <br />Mike Black showed the first plan for Royal Oaks which was 140 apartment units on 8.5 acres - <br />density is 16 units per acre. He then presented the new plan. They took the apartments out. <br />They now show about 269 units - which is 3.1 units per acre gross - the other plan was 4.1. He <br />added they have been talking to neighboring residents. The density now is about nine units per <br />acre. He felt this plan would work for them and the City. The net density of 4.9 units per acre is <br />a gross of about 3.1. The old plan gross was 4.1 with a net of 6.6. He added that they plan to tie <br />into the trail system. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen feels this is all speculative because the comp plan is being rewritten <br />and there is a moratorium. This asks a lot of our Planning Commission and the Planning <br />Department. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session - April 24, 2000 <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.