Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Van Scoy asked what the distance was from her property to the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Mr. Kline indicated probably about 10 feet, then the right-of-way is 33 feet. He suggested the <br />homeowner may want to access her driveway from the new street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson noted the developer made a good point about accessing the new road. If <br />the homeowner can find a way to hook up to it, it may be better. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he would request the developer contact the Diedrichs on screening. <br /> <br />Mr. Kline stated subdividing Lots 1 and 2 in a north/south orientation relieves the issue with the <br />accessory building, but they will have two double-frontage lots. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated usually double-frontage is a good thing from the City's <br />perspective. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if the developer has looked at the Staff review letter. <br /> <br />Mr. Kline stated he has no concern with it. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated there are some comments about the drainage system. He <br />stated they need to firm up the wetland areas. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to close the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Brauer, Shepherd, <br />Van Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Reeve. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairperson Nixt, to approve the preliminary <br />plat contingent on compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated May 30, 2003, revised to <br />include screening for the property at 16919 Tiger Street, and the applicant receiving a variance to <br />cul-de-sac length. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Shepherd, Van Scoy <br />and Watson. Voting No: Commissioner Brauer. Absent: Commissioner Reeve. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated he does not like the cul-de-sac situation. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary Plat Review of Alpine Acres; Case of Oak Creek <br />Builders <br /> <br />Case #3: Request for Site Plan Review of Alpine Acres; Case 'of Oak Creek Builders <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Alpine Acres <br />Addition; Case of Oak Creek Builders <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2003 <br /> Page 5 of 23 <br /> <br />P5 <br /> <br /> <br />