Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/20/2001

Home

CAS I0 REQUEST FOR SKETCH PLAN REVIEW OF LORD OF LIFE CHURCH PROPERTY; CASE OF LORD OF LIFE CHURCH By: Principal Planner Patrick Trudgeon Background: The Lord of Life Church has applied has applied for sketch plan approval for a 'minor subdivision to resubdivide several parcels that they own into three parcels. One parcel will contain the church, one parcel is proposed to be developed with two 47~unit senior apmtment buildings, and a third parcel is proposed to event~m{ly contain a cemetery. The following items are enclosed: a) b) c) d) e) Site location map Sketch plan Narrative of the proposed development submitted by applicant Letter fi-om Jim and 'Lauri Hanson regarding proposed development City Staff Review Letter dated August 31, 2001 Notification: No surrounding properties were notified of the sketch plan submittal. However, the applicant ~s asking that the property be rezoned and receive a variance which require public heatings. Notices of these public hearings were sent to property owners within 500 feet. Observations: The property is currently zoned R-3U Residential and B-1 Business. The applicant will be asking for a rezoning of the property to MR, Multiple Residential. The March 2001 Draft Comprehensive Plan shows this area as being Pub[k/Quasi Public and High Density Residential. The property contains 41.51 acres with 3.63 of these acres classified as wetlands:' The sketch plan shows a gross density bf 2.21 umm per acre. When the wetlands are factored out, the net density for the whole development is 2.42 units per acre. The follow/~., g chart shows how much space each type of land use proposes to use and its gross and net density. ii!~i!i::~iiii!iiii::~i~iii~::!!~:~::~::::i~i~i!ii~!i~i~:::ii::~!~ii::ii!~:::?.::~ii~i~::i :.>; :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............... : ....... ~ ............ : ................................ '.':: :.'.'-:~:-:::::: >.:.--'::.-.'..::::: Area (less r-o-w) 42.51 20.53 10.05 10.93 Wetland 3.63 .93 . 2.70 '0 ' Net Area 38.88 19.60 7.354 I 10.93 # of units 94 0 94 0 ......... ........ · ............. ..... <...,.~. ~.>.z.~.~:.: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: !~5~J~ii!i!~[~[!ii~i~i!!J!!iii~i!ili!!i[il!ii[ir!~!~iiii!J?~.'"'iii:~ ~ ~J:?'~5:! :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: As can be seen from the table, the actual net density for the whole development ske is quite Iow. However, the net density on the actual lot that the senior apartment buildings are located on will be less than the maximum allowable density of' 15 umts per acre.