Laserfiche WebLink
Sk~.tch Plan Ke~,iew: The Village of Snnfi.~h Lake <br />.December 2.7, 2002 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />¸9. <br /> <br />you are proposing to have narrower fight-of-ways (50 feet versus 60-feet) md.the ex'-tensNe <br />use of private roads to serve the 3 g association maintained cattages'~'.If.these deviationS from. <br />CiW Code are found accmptable, they will be proc¢ssed as part of the P.UD,.' <br /> <br />Ace.s, and Str. eets.: The sketch p. lan .identifies proper, extension: of publi~ streets ithroUghout <br />the plat, providing .connection with streets previoUSly consm~cted ~as .part of the Chestnut . <br />Hills and. CheStnut Ridge subdivisions (Tungsten Way and 146m' Ave.)." This plan.is' <br />acceptable, to the City..The City will prepare, a traffic impact study at the developers expense <br />for conSideration at the prelJmlnazy plat stage: Public stream .within-the subdivision scale off <br />'the plan at varying widths between 40-to 55 feet. The Cit-fs mi~mum standard is 60 feet The <br />private s~eet sho.wn do not.meet the City's cun~nt standards for sUch streets: The Citfs <br />current poi. icy requires' a ¢entrai public street: .k is the Ciry'i. understanding that you will be <br />proposing to .deviate fromthese standards as-part of the proposed PUD.' <br /> <br />Lot Size and Dimensions: As preVioUSly.mentioned, the proposed iingle fatally'lots 'appear <br />to be as small as 5,500 square feet and lot widths as. narrow as 50' feet_..The current <br />minimum for urban single family lots is 10, 800 square feet-and lot widths of g0 feet It is the <br />City's understanding that. you will be proposing to deviate from these standards as' part of the <br />proposed PUD. <br /> <br />.Grading and Drainage: A detailed grading and drainage plan will be'~eviewed during the <br />preliminary .plat stage. <br /> <br /> All wetlands within the site need to be identified and delineated and dedicated'or{ the final <br /> plat as drainage, and utility easements. The National' Wetland Inventory map suggests them <br /> may be two small wetlands in the northeastern comer of the site. Any wetland filling or.' <br /> mitigation wOl. require permit action' by the. Lower Rum River Water iManagement <br /> Organization. ' - .'. <br /> <br /> A permit .from the Lower Rum Ri.ver Watershed M~nagemen~ :Organization i and the <br /> Minnesota l~oll, ution Control' Agency will. be required .for drainage... The developer is <br /> responsible for obtaining any .and ail permits required from other regulatory agencies. <br /> <br />The City ha~' enacted an ordinance tha~ requires an. elevation survey at the time of footing. <br />inspection to ensure compliance with the approved grading plan_ 'No: grades shal!'.be flatter-' <br />than- 1%. Grades flatter than 2% will. require a eertifi¢ate of grading prior, to an OCsupaney. <br />permit being granted ' <br /> <br />Easements.. The standard 1'0 foot ckai~age and utility easements. (5-feet on' common property <br />lines) must be provided aroUnd the perimeter .of all lots on the preliminary m~d.final'plets." <br />Ail wetlands lOcated on. the property'must be delineated and dedicated as drainage-easements. <br />All utilities:, are to be protected with a minimum 20 foot dr~iinage and atility easement This' <br />provision is subject' to change depending on' the depth of the utilities:' '" <br /> <br />Utilities. The development will be served~ by' municipal water and" san/tary sewer. City <br />sanitary services surroUnd the sire. The site can be adequately'serviced by these utilities. - <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br /> <br />