My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 05/08/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 05/08/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:51:26 AM
Creation date
7/9/2003 7:47:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
05/08/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item I2 Mitigation Element. <br /> <br />Wetland Sequencing - Minnesota Rules 8420, also known as the Wetland Conservation <br />Act (WCA), requires specific steps ("sequencing") be taken when evaluating mitigation <br />for unavoidable wetland impacts. The WCA requires that wet[and impacts be avoided, if <br />possible. If wetland avoidance cannot be accomplished, impacts to wetlands need to be <br />minimized. Finally, any wetland impacts that can not either be avoided or minimized to <br />the extent possible, must be mitigated though wetland replacement, The wetland <br />replacement must mitigate all wetland functions and values lost as part of the wetland <br />impact. <br /> <br />The degradation present on site allows-,the applicant to evaluate sequencing flexibility in <br />their mitigation plan. It also allows the Techn/cal Evaluation Panel (TEP) the <br />opportunity to be flexible on the sequen.¢'.mg provisions of the WCA rule.' This process <br />may only be applied in the event the wetlands on-ske are degraded to the point where <br />replacement of the wetland would result in a gain in functions and values. This is an item <br />that will be considered by the TEP durimg the permitting process. <br /> <br />Wetlands located on site are described in the. Wetland Delineation Report (Appendix A), <br />and are discussed in Item 1.0. With a few exceptioas, wetlands located within the <br />boundaries of the RTC are either cropped or are of low quality. These wetlands have <br />marginal functions and values due to their Iow vegetative diversity, partial drainage and <br />lack of connectivity to other nearby wetlands and natural areas. Sequencing is addressed <br />as follows: <br /> <br />Avoidance: The better quality portions ofex./sting wetlands are generally avoided. This <br />includes all of wetlands B, C and D. <br /> <br />Minimization: The mix of development proposed as part of the RTC requires that retail, <br />commercial and residential land use blocks are a minimum size with adequate <br />infrastructure to service them. The focus of minimization has been to incorporate as <br />much of ex/sting wetland area into a central'greenwaY corridor, thereby lowering overall <br />wetland loss across the project site. To avoid indirect impacts to remaining wetlands, <br />each of the development blocks wi/t incorporate a treatment train of stonmwater best <br />management practices designed to improve water quality and lower wetland bounce <br />magnitude and duration. Currently, row cropping occurs into the wetlands. The KTC <br />wiI1 incorporate wetland buffers wherever practical. <br /> <br />Wetland Replacement: The LR.R~) Stormwater Management Plan provides that the <br />following may be eligible for wetland replacement credits: <br /> <br />Creation of"new" wetland - Rules, Sub-part 11; <br />Addition of"public value" Rules, Sub-part (5; ..... <br />"Public value" restoration from invasive species to permanent native, non- <br />invasive species - Rules, Sub-part 8; 'and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.