My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 05/02/1995
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 05/02/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 2:52:28 PM
Creation date
7/9/2003 11:46:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/02/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Holland, LaDue, Deemer, <br />Hendriksen, Terry, and Thorud. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />David Taus, President of Trend Scientific, gave a brief presentation about their business wherein <br />they manufacture FDA regulated laboratory diagnostic and test kits for hospitals. <br /> <br />Case #4: Request for Site Plan Review; Case of Kenko, Inc. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski reported that Kenko, Inc. is requesting site plan approval to construct an <br />office building and a maintenance building on Lot 3, Block 1, HY-10 Ramsey 4th Addition, and <br />Lot 2, Block 1, HY~10 Ramsey 3rd Addition. The office building is designed to front Armstrong <br />Boulevard but access would be derived from 147th Avenue and Ferret Street. The buildings meet <br />the setback requirements from Armstrong Boulevard, 147th Avenue, and Ferret Street. The office <br />structure is a 2-story, 2,200 square foot building proposed to be constructed of rock or broken face <br />concrete block. The maintenance building is 6,000 square feet with a 750 square foot mezzanine <br />level and is proposed to be constructed of pre-cast concrete panels. The site plan proposes a <br />landscaped berm along Armstrong Boulevard that wraps around the northeast corner of the site to <br />screen equipment storage from traffic travelling south on Armstrong Boulevard. Screening <br />consists of a combination of fencing and trees is proposed to screen equipment storage from 147th <br />Avenue, Ferret Street, the driveway to the office building, and the adjacent lot to the east. The <br />property will be secured with a chain link fence and trees along the fence line. As the maintenance <br />area is going to service heavy equipment, they are proposing surfacing the western portion of the <br />property with a gravel road because bituminous will not hold up with heavy equipment travel. <br />There will be concrete curbing. <br /> <br />Noting the gross floor area restriction for accessory buildings outlined in the City Staff review <br />letter, Commissioner Deemer suggested an administrative moving of lot lines (thereby putting each <br />building on a separate lot) would eliminate the need for a variance. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski agreed that is an option, and suggested doing whatever would be the least cost to <br />the applicant. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hendriksen inquired whether the City should be looking at a wider road easement <br />for 147th Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski agreed it may be wise to keep their options open. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer objected to taking the use of that property away unless the City is going to <br />pay them for it. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski questioned the applicant as to how critical the area in front of the building was and <br />whether they could consider moving the fence back. <br /> <br />James Brommer, representing Kenko, Inc., stated restrictions are being put on this property <br />vicariously and he objected to needless restrictions. He questioned the purpose for the 20-foot <br />setback for landscaping and then the fence behind that. He felt that all the setbacks were cutting <br />down a 7-acre useable piece of property and making it unuseable. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski stated that if the site plan were approved as presented and the need arose to expand <br />the road seven feet, there would still be room but there would no longer be a 20-foot setback of <br />green space to the fence. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer reviewed the City Code and stated he could find no mention of the <br />requirement of 20 feet of green space. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 2, 1995 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.