Laserfiche WebLink
Case #11: Report from Road and Bridge Committee <br /> <br />1) Status Report on Sunwood Drive Project <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski reported that he anticipates bids the end of September for the <br />Sunwood Drive project. One issue we have had to deal with is a precise alignment for <br />Sunwood. We previously brought an alignment to City Council but the Kuraks have <br />expressed concerns about that one. We met with them and they asked that the alignment be <br />brought further north to abut the two wetlands; it seemed reasonable. Subsequent to our <br />meeting, Mr. Kurak called about an alignment to parallel the roadway and go between the <br />two designated wetlands. Mr. Jankowski felt that would create too many tight curves and <br />the Road and Bridge Committee concurred. He stated he would like a decision on the <br />alignment for the Kurak property and to be able to field stake Mr. Deemer's property. He <br />asked that the Council confirm the recommendation of the Road and Bridge Committee that <br />the final alignment be the one referred to as the approved alignment dated August 8, 1995. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson inquired if the property owners would be dedicating fight-of-way <br />if the old road was used. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder replied that the right-of-way cost is relatively insignificant. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson stated that in talking to the landowners, they suggested they <br />might be interested in giving right-of-way to the City. He inquired what the speed would <br />be due to the curves. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski replied that the very tight curves would be 30 m.p.h. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson inquired if from an engineering standpoint, is coming from a stop <br />much better than a 30 m.p.h, curve in the middle. Traffic naturally would be slowing <br />down - it would basically be a 35 m.p.h, road. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski answered that it would be posted 35 m.p.h, but would be designed for <br />more. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman commented that it would be difficult to maneuver emergency <br />vehicles on these tight curves. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peterson commented that he has a number of residents in his <br />neighborhood who are very concerned about the speed on 153rd. The way it's designed, it <br />becomes a race track4 <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman felt that collector streets should be kept somewhat straight. <br />He stated that the Road and Bridge Committee recommended this alignment that is to the <br />north and abuts the two wetlands and is labeled August 8 approved alignment. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman and seconded by Councilmember Beahen to select <br />the road alignment through the Kurak's property labeled "August 8, 1995 approved <br />alignment". <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Zimmerman, Beahen and <br />Beyer. Voting No: CouncilmemberPeterson. <br /> <br />2) Trunk ltighway #47 Access/Corridor Study <br /> <br />City Council/August 8, 1995 <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />