Laserfiche WebLink
Consensus of the Committee was to recommend that Council direct Staff to solicit quotes <br />for the removal inspection and necessary repairs of Well No. 1, initiate dialog with the City <br />of Anoka to prepare an agreement for the purchase of water through an interconnect to meet <br />the needs of Ramsey water utilities peak demand period, and to authorize the preparation of <br />plans and specifications for the construction of an interconnect with the City of Anoka. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Zimmerman stated he agrees with Staff's <br />recommendation but he suggested looking at locating Well//3 along Highway #10. City <br />Administrator Schroeder stated that if the City continues at this growth rate, Well #3 could <br />be paid for with WAC. <br /> <br />Case #2: Sunwood Drive N.W. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski noted the copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />(EAW) for Sunwood Drive N.W. He called attention to the costs associated with the <br />SunwoodDrive project. The costs would be funded through the City's MSA construction <br />account. In addition, sanitary sewer and water main will be incorporated within the road to <br />be compatible with future development. The cost for sanitary sewer improvements is <br />estimated to be $23,800 and the water main improvements are estimated at $157,100. <br />Funding for these improvements would need to come from the City's sewer and water <br />trunk funds. Mr. Jankowski anticipated that the construction of the road will generate <br />development in the near future. Within the alignment study, an area has been designated <br />which is deemed to receive benefit from the construction of this road. Staff is proposing to <br />collect up,to $233,200 in future impact fees from areas within this designateed area benefit. <br />The basis for the collection of this impact fee is consistent with the financial policies applied <br />to Sunny Ponds and Wood Pond Hills when those portions of Sunwood Drive N.W. were <br />constructed. Mr. Jankowski stated that Staff believes all land owners within the described <br />area of benefit should be notified and presented with a copy of the alignment study if this <br />policy is affirmed by the City Council. Mr. Jankowski stated that Planning Commissioners <br />Deemer and Hendriksen have suggested that utilization of the existing dirt road, which <br />currently provides access to two properties on the east shore of Sunfish Lake, could reduce <br />the costs associated with this project. Mr. Jankowski believes there are negative impacts <br />associated with such a realignment, but he assured the Planning Commission that he would <br />review the cost savings that might be realized if a 66-foot width of right-of-way along the <br />existing dirt road were to be donated free of charge to the City. He listed the following <br />negative impacts associated with realigning the roadway down the MSA street: 1) The <br />considerable shorter turn radius would reduce the design speed of the roadway from 40 <br />mph to 30' mph. The maximum amount of super elevation would be needed to meet the 30 <br />mph design limits; 2) The alignment of the existing dirt roadway would need to be <br />modified by pushing the roadway further to the east to avoid a small wetland and would <br />result in more than a 60° turn; 3) The alignment would move the intersection, with the <br />extension.of Tungsten Street N.W., 400 to 500 feet further to the north, which would <br />require traffic to "backtrack" twice this distance to get to the desired location, the south end <br />of Sunfish. Lake. This extra travel distance will discourage a considerable number of trips, <br />particularl5, those from 147th Lane N.W., from using the MSA street and opt for traveling <br />to Sunfish Lake Boulevard N.W. through Hunter's Hill; and 4) Locating the alignment <br />onto the existing dirt roadway will result in two direct accesses onto the collector street. In <br />addition, future development on the west side of the street will likely also desire direct <br />access onto the collector street as there would be limited opportunity to accommodate <br />residential streets to service the area. It is sound policy to minimize, if not totally eliminate, <br />all direct access to collector streets. <br /> <br />Road and Bridge/April 12, 1994 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />