My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 07/26/1994
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1994
>
Minutes - Council - 07/26/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 4:23:49 PM
Creation date
7/16/2003 8:02:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/26/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Feldspar. The site plan proposes an additional access onto Riverdale. It doesn't appear <br />that the existing access onto Riverdale will serve any particular function and Staff is <br />recommending that it be eliminated. The Planning Commission felt that the two accesses <br />onto Riverdale could be a benefit and recommended that Mr. Noard be allowed to retain the <br />existing access onto Riverdale after the new one is constructed. The applicant has applied <br />for a permit from the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization (LRRWMO) for <br />the development. This permit is necessary as the facility discharges directly into the storm <br />sewer which empties into the Mississippi River. <br /> <br />City Administrator Schroeder explained that when the Rivenwick development was platted, <br />the City determined that Feldspar Street N.W. should be realigned. The MSA street was <br />not completed due to expense. He noted that the configuration of the Anoka Ramsey <br />Sports Center parcel is changing. Mr. Ivan Schwartzman has deeded the remnant parcel <br />created by abandoned Feldspar right-of-way to the City. The City is proposing to deed the <br />property to Mr. Noard for the purpose of expanding his off-street parking and maneuvering <br />area. As compensation for' the property received (approximately a $20,000 value) Mr. <br />Noard will pave the new section of Feldspar Street N.W. from Rivenwick to Highway #10 <br />N.W. Mr. Schroeder stated that the engineering estimate of this project, plus site work <br />associated with it, is $39,134. Therefore, in addition to the land, tax increments, as <br />opposed to MSA funds, are proposed to cover the $19,124 shortfall in the land exchange. <br />Mr. Schroeder explai~cd that the Anoka Ramsey Sports Center was a tax increment <br />development in 1988 with an estimated payback of City development expenses of <br />apparently 10 years. In actuality, this return on investment was accelerated. This current <br />expansion project proposes additional tax increment financing participation. Proposed is <br />assistance in the amount of $ i .00/square foot of new construction upon project completion <br />and each of the subsequent four years toward site improvements in the form of a loan <br />granted to tile City from tile developer. This second phase of the project has about a 12- <br />year payback, assuming no inflationary increase. The projects, including both phases, <br />result in estimated annual revenues of $30,120, with total expenses of under $146,000 <br />including the roadway alignment. This equates to roughly a seven to eight year return on <br />investment averaged for' the two phases. Mr. Schroeder added that Staff feels this project <br />sufficiently passes the "but for'" law - it would not be "but for" tax increment financing. <br />Staff recommends site plan approval contingent upon entering into the development <br />agreeme n t. <br /> <br />John Nom'd, Anoka Ramscy Sports Center, 6760 Highway #10 N.W., Ramsey, stated that <br />there is verbiage in thc development agreement that puts this project somewhat in jeopardy. <br />There is mention of a TIF delinquency. He said he is delinquent $16,000. This is due to <br />2.5 years of debating this and waiting for answers, which he finally received. He stated <br />that this has aothing to do with the present project. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder explained that in 1989, the City implemented an SAS and lateral benefit <br />charge to the ulility district; the City endeavored to put this charge in place in 1991. Mr. <br />Noard received his first bill, which included a significant increase, and he wondered what <br />this was for. With most developments, the charges were paid up front; in the special <br />district, the ('.it3, amortizt:d the charges over 10 year's at 8 percent 'interest. There was two <br />years between xvhen lhe City set it and when the charge happened. Since that time, Mr. <br />Noard has been attempting to work with the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Noard stated that it is his opinion that this should have been covered under TIF on the <br />last project and suggested this does not have anything to do with this particular project. He <br />stated he will pay it, bul he will fight it, and added that this puts the present project in <br />jeopardy. <br /> <br />Cily Council/July 26, 1994 <br /> Page 22 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.