Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Nixt asked if there was an issue with timing. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated they would need to waive the 60 day requirement, since it will <br />reach 120 days on August Ist. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated the applicant's options are to waive the 60 days and work with staff <br />or have the Planning Commission deny the request. <br /> <br />Ms. Moreland indicated her client would waive the 60 day requirement. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt requested the issue be put on the September Planning Commission meeting <br />agenda. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated he feels if it cannot be worked out by then, it will not be. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald asked that the Commissioners e-mail her and let her know what they like <br />or do not like with the current Home Occupation Ordinance proposal, since Staff needs guidance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer agreed this would be a good idea. He indicated he likes the chart on page <br />six of their packet showing the differences. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked that they be open-minded about other changes that may be needed also. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt reiterated his motion directing Staff to work with the applicant and come up <br />with a proposal for this property including residential and commercial use appropriate for this <br />parcel. Commissioner Brauer conf~rmed his second of the motion. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Brauer, Johnson, Reeves, <br />Shepherd, Van Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Case #3 <br /> <br />Public Hearing for Proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald advised that the EPTF held a joint meeting with the Park and Recreation <br />Commission and the Planning Commission on March 20, 2003 to review the preliminary draft <br />ordinance. The final draft is enclosed for your review and information. She stated the ordinance <br />establishes some minimum performance standards as far as tree preservation and replacement for <br />new development. It also includes some enforcement tools to address diseased and/or hazardous <br />trees on private property. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald explained that in the subdivision code, more detail is needed, and <br />Section 5.14 needs to be updated to correlate with this ordinance. She indicated a number of the <br />EPTF members are here to answer any questions. <br /> <br />-252- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/July 10, 2003 <br /> Page 7 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />