Laserfiche WebLink
dated May 3 ~, 2,003, revised June 23, 2003 and additional City Engineering comments dated July <br />25, 2003. ~ <br />Motion Canied.I Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Reeves, Shepherd, <br />Van Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Brauer. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br /> l~equest for Site Plan Review of Town Center Gardens; Case of BrightKeys <br />, ~evelopment Corporation <br /> <br />Principal PI ~finn~ Trudgeon summarized the report, indicating the landscape plan referred to in <br />the previouslca, is on page 27 and 28 of the Commissioner's packet, and acknowledged the <br />current land~ap~ ordinance is a little onerous. He stated staff will work with the developer to <br />come up wit~ an~acceptable plan. <br />Chairperson ~ix( asked what the photographs in the packet represent. <br /> <br />Mr. Domme~ stated those were photos of the new urbanist style homes they will be using, and <br />they demonslrate[ how brick can be used to vary the style of the home, as well as varying the <br />brick color ~ add further dimension and variety. <br /> <br />Chairperson Ni~ asked if the price of the homes in the photographs was comparable to the <br />expected price in'this development. <br /> <br />Mr. Domme~' stated they were, with homes starting at about $140,000 with a single car garage, <br />and going up ~to the higher $180,000. <br /> <br />Commissmn~r Vb.n Scoy asked what was planned for screening. <br /> <br />Principal platmet4 Trudgeon explained the development does not directly abut any lower density <br />units, so scr~nir~g is not really an issue. He stated when the two outlots are being developed, <br /> · [ [ <br />they wall nee~l to{ screen those areas, and the northwest comer comes close, but the lots next to <br />that comer are mixed residential/commercial use land, so screening is not required in that <br />location. ; <br /> <br /> r <br /> <br />Commissioner V~n Scoy asked if screening from the road is necessary. <br /> <br />Principal Planner iTrudgeon stated it was not required. <br />Commissione~. Van Scoy asked if staff had any comments on the ghost plat. <br /> <br />Principal Plan~?er iTrudgeon stated they have not directly commented on the layout of those units. <br />He indicatedI th6[y wanted to see the general layout, and the possible road layout with <br />connections, dmd noted they were showing about seven units an acre. <br /> <br />Mr. Dommerlsta~ed actually it is less than seven units, since they will use a detached home <br />product for p~rtiohs of the development, which will lessen the density. He indicated since they <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 25, 2003 <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />