Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Management Intern Gladhill indicated two driveways are allowed on this property in this zoning <br />district. <br /> <br />Management Intern Gladhill indicated there did not need to be a firewall required at this time. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Levine stated he went and looked at the parcel and he did not think the existing <br />shed was visible or offensive. He stated he was not in favor of removing the shed in order to <br />build the proposed structure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rogers agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated his concern was they have multiple times expanded the storage <br />space and they are still looking at a CUP. He wondered at what point they come up with some <br />sort of guidelines that work because they are constantly dealing with these issues. He asked Mr. <br />Burrell if he needed a fifty-foot shed. <br /> <br />Mr. Burrell stated he would like to have enough room to be able to walk around his camper and <br />boat and to also storehis tools and a Model A. He stated he would also like to get a four-wheeler <br />and keep everything under cover for security purposes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer indicated the reason he brought this up was because the items listed are <br />not unusual to what other people have and he wondered if maybe when they get to the ordinance <br />if it is really too tight the way it is. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated they have not had a request for an overage in almost two years. . <br />This is the second request since they increased the square footage in 2006. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland stated the building seemed so excessive and having it sitting right in <br />line with the house does not look right to her. even if it seems appropriate. She wondered if they <br />are going to end up with an industrial park in the area with having all of the accessory buildings <br />being approved. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt did not think that taking anything off the back would do anything visually <br />and did not believe it would be an issue. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Levine noted it is in compliance right now the way it is and he did not see a <br />problem. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland stated if this building were pushed back a little further so it is scaled <br />back from the home it would not be so overbearing. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated this could be a condition of the CUP. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rogers wondered why the existing shed was placed so far back on the lot. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2008 <br />Page 4 of 12 <br />