My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/22/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 07/22/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:23:17 AM
Creation date
7/17/2008 2:01:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/22/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
267
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
maxunum of 10 seconds. This time frame ~=,=as established based upon careful calculations of the <br />streets from ~a=hich these signs could be seen: speed limits and traffic volumes in addition to the <br />community's concern over the .extent to u=hick moving images could distract drivers. Ho«=ever; <br />Seattle also limits the size of their electronic sibis to a maximum of 1;000 square inches, with no <br />single dimension greater than three feet; thus minimizing the effect of video images. <br />4.2.5 Sign Placement and Spacin; <br />Reb latin~ the number of dynamic sign potentially visible to a driver at-any one time as ~=,=ell as <br />the position of the sign in relationship to the road«=ay may reduce distraction to drivers. Spacing <br />requirements should consider the speed, width and horizontal and vertical aligrunent of the <br />roadway. <br />Some communities have established minimum distances between electronic signs. Establishu7g <br />an adequate distance between these types of devices seems particularly important if a fairly fast <br />rate of change. is allowed for the purpose o~ facilitating sequenced messages or if animation acid <br />video imaging is allowed. Closely spaced signs attempting to convey sequenced messages may <br />simply create visual overload and anover-stimulated driving environmen. Research conducted <br />to date has not yielded ulformation_about optimal electronic sign spacing. Seattle adopted a 35- <br />foot spacing requirement for flleir electronic signs based upon multiple levels of analysis of the <br />downtown cit}= environment in which these signs are present. <br />Due to the varying characteristics of individual road«=ays in this regard, overlay districts <br />allowing dynamic signage with conditions specific to that area- could die considered. Overlay <br />districts could also take into account.other locational factors such as offset from the roadw=ay and <br />conspicuity. Detenninulg appropriate offsets ~ from the. roadway must consider roadt~=ay clear <br />zone requirements as well as spacing of frontage roads and access points, ~=,=bile also considering <br />the signage too far outside the driver's line of sight may be a further distraction. Conspicuit5=, a <br />sign's ability to stand out from its surroundings; should also be considered. <br />4.2.6 Text Size <br />Legibility is another important property of signage. The preferred approach used ~~=ithin highway <br />signing is that drivers can read text that is 1 inch high from 30 feet away. Larger text is needed <br />for signs to be legible at greater distances. Large, legible text allo«=s the driver to read the <br />billboard from varying distances and focus on the driving task. Conversely, with small text; the <br />driver is more likely to focus on the sign for a longer period of. time and possibly be more <br />adversely distracted. However, .the size or type of text or the amourrt of text due ~is rarely <br />regulated. <br />125 <br />-233- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.