Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Backous agreed with the electronic locks for the bathrooms installed. He <br />questioned if that type of locks could be installed in Central Park to allow for additional usage of <br />the restrooms. <br /> <br />Parks Supervisor Riverblood advised that he had not cost that project out but estimated that cost <br />to be about $500 per door. <br /> <br />Commissioner Backous questioned if that IS a project that could be added to the capital <br />improvement plan for the next year. <br /> <br />Parks Supervisor Riverblood advised that if the cost rises above $1,000 or $2,000 another <br />funding mechanism should be looked at for funding, such as partnering with a youth association. <br /> <br />Commissioner Barr thought that the locks could be added to one building at a time to allow for <br />additional usage of the restrooms. She explained that it is a lot of responsibility for the <br />concession stand volunteer to handle and thought that the electronic locks would be a good idea. <br /> <br />Parks Supervisor Riverblood advised that he would investigate the cost and possibilities of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Backous thought that rather than putting $40,000 into creating another restroom <br />for a park within the City it should be used to improve Central Park and the existing restrooms. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hansen advised that older residents that traveled to Central Park to watch their <br />grandkids play sports would not use the port-a-potty and would rather leave. <br />Parks Supervisor Riverblood advised that he would investigate the cost of the project and could <br />possibly use that $40,000 towards the improvements needed at Central Park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Backous agreed that he would rather spend the funding in Central Park, which is <br />heavily used, than to build an additional bathroom at another location. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns questioned if the Commission would rather improve Central Park than add the <br />restroom to Rivers Bend Park. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Commission was to improve the facilities at Central Park rather than add a <br />restroom facility to Rivers Bend Park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Erickson questioned if a port-a-potty could be added to Woodland Green for the <br />time being. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hansen questioned the cost to purchase a port-a-potty. <br /> <br />Parks Supervisor Riverblood advised that insurance is put onto the port-a-potty but explained <br />that the last time a facility like that had been burned the cost was about $1,000. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation CommissionlNovember 13, 2008 <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />