My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/17/1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1991
>
Minutes - Council - 12/17/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 9:58:58 AM
Creation date
7/31/2003 9:22:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/17/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case #10: Adoption of 1992 Goals <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Beyer and seconded by Councilmember Cich to table this case for <br />further review by the Personnel Committee. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Peterson stated he was hesitant to table this and felt the <br />Council should make a commitment. City Administrator Schroeder stated he is looking for <br />acceptance or rejection of the goals and/or reprioritizing of them. Councilmember Hardin felt that <br />Council should accept the goals as proposed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer withdrew her motion and Councilmember Cich withdrew his second to the <br />motion. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to schedule a <br />workshop for Saturday, January 11, 1992 from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon to review the goals. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer, Cich and <br />Hardin. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #11: Franchise Fees <br /> <br />City Administrator Schroeder stated that there are several cities in the area that have levied franchise <br />fees against public utilities operating in the area. He stated this would be another source of revenue <br />and asked the Council if they would like to discuss this further or possibly have the Budget <br />Committee review it. <br /> <br />Councihnember Beyer stated she liked the idea of charging the fee. <br /> <br />Mayor Gilbertson stated he was opposed to the idea as that would force the utility companies to <br />raise their rates and pass that added cost onto the residents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer felt the Budget Committee should review the possibility of charging this <br />fee. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cich agreed with the Mayor's comments. <br /> <br />Cotmcilmember Hardin agreed with the Mayor but noted that it is an additional revenue source that <br />merits further review. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hardin and seconded by Councilmember Peterson to direct the Budget <br />Committee to consider a public utility gross earnings tax. <br /> <br />Motion failed. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Hardin and Peterson. Voting No: Mayor <br />Gilbertson, Councilmembers Beyer and Cich. <br /> <br />Case #12: Adopt 1992 Schedule of Rates and Charges <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to adopt Resolution <br />#91-12-273 adopting the 1992 Schedule of Rates and Charges. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer, Cich and <br />Hardin. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />City Council/December 17, 1991 <br /> Page 9 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.