Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Assistant City Administrator Nelson indicated there were concerns raised by Public Works about <br />the dry stack material that need further discussion. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated if Public Works has a problem with the dry stack wall it should be <br />eliminated from the choices. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson indicated the fence can be discussed further, but a <br />wrought iron fence would be preferable. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to add in at least one of the components of the perimeter fence <br />and look at alternates for' both of the components. <br /> <br />Increase Emerzencv Generator Size <br />The consensus of the Council was to remain with the 250kw emergency generator. <br /> <br />Additional Landscaping for coordination with parking ramv <br />No determination to be made at this time. <br /> <br />Pervious Pavers versus Asphalt Pavinz <br />Mr. Redmond reviewed with the Council the option of pervious pavers versus asphalt paving. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained the guiding principal behind the design <br />guidelines is to select a Best Management Practice to increase the water quality of the <br />downstream water. This can be done in a number of ways, such as rain gardens and porous <br />pavement. In this instance the options are to utilize a stormsceptor system or the porous pavers. <br />Since this project creates a new outlet to the Mississippi River the Best Management Practice <br />will go above and beyond what is normally required. He noted it would be difficult to require <br />this of other developers if the City does not adopt this practice. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the maintenance that would be required to upkeep the pavers. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson advised this area is not likely the best situation for the <br />pavers due to the maintenance that will be required. He explained the requirements will be met <br />with the stormsceptor and the water quality will be protected. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig suggested the porous pavers be utilized in a sidewalk area that uses <br />sweepers, rather than heavy vehicles like plows where damage to the pavers would be likely. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec directed staff to review this with the Public Works Department and bring more <br />information back to the CounCil. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated she understands the maintenance concerns, but the Council <br />should also think about the statement they want to make here above and beyond the maintenance <br />concerns. There are a lot of benefits to the City saying it will be their policy to take a leadership <br /> <br />City Council Work Session/February 1, 2005 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />