Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Haas Steffen inquired about the City's liability with regard to accidents <br />happening where a stop sign maybe should have been. <br /> <br />Councilmember Beyer responded that if the City knowingly lets a hazardous condition exist, <br />that's placing the City in undue liability. By addressing it here, we are saying it's a somewhat <br />hazardous situation. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski stated that the only signs a municipality must post are railroad crossing signs. He <br />added that if you are going to do something, you have to make sure you do it right. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen asked what the potential is for an increase in traffic in this area. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski answered that the area is pretty much developed, therefore the potential for <br />increase in traffic is not great. <br /> <br />The Committee agreed with the Traffic Review Committee's recommendation of posting a stop <br />sign on the west leg of the intersection. <br /> <br />Mr..Jankowski reported that Case #3 is a request by Mr. Gene Chancelor to replace existing yield <br />signs with stop signs at the intersection of Riverdale and Dolomite Streets. Mr. Jankowski <br />observed that the existing yield signs on Dolomite do assign right-of-way to the traffic on <br />Riverdale, which is a collector street. A 1995 traffic count on Riverdale was 320 vehicles per <br />day, which is a relatively low count for a collector street. He added that the existing yield signs <br />are in good condition. The Traffic Committee's recommendation is that stop signs would replace <br />the existing yield signs in the future when either traffic increases to more than 1,000 vehicles per <br />day or the existing yield signs need replacement because of condition. At this time, there should <br />be no change. <br /> <br />The Road and Bridge Committee agreed with the recommended no change. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski stated that Mr. Gene Chancellor had also requested placing stop signs on the east <br />and west legs of the intersection of I 37th Avenue and Ebony. Mr. Chancellor feels the existing <br />c'ondition of the three-legged intersection of 13 7th Avenue and Ebony Street which is <br />uncontrolled by any signage, is unsafe. Mr. Jankowski summarized that this is a three-legged <br />intersection located in a residential district. Normal rules of the road would require Ebony to <br />yield to the through traffic on 137th Avenue. Sight lines on all legs are relatively good, but there <br />are several large spruce trees on the northeast comer of the intersection. The Traffic Committee <br />reached a consensus that additional signage is not necessary at the present time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen asked about the volume and whether or not it was not adequate to <br />warrant a stop sign. She wondered if it was about 300 a day since it is in the same neighborhood <br />as Case #3. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski answered yes, it is about the same. Although an uncontrolled intersection may <br />appear to be unduly hazardous, on low volume intersections, it is important that each vehicle <br /> <br />Road and Bridge Committee/January 14, 1997 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />