My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/14/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 07/14/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:02:46 PM
Creation date
7/9/2009 11:31:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/14/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Engineer Tim!:Limmer respolidcd the b el'1e tit of this is that right now there is storm sewer in <br />the street at Riverdale and its overloaded as it is. The benetit is utilizing the easement in the <br />right of way to construct a pipe down Riverdule Drive where all other properties can event\Jally <br />connect to. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Dehen asked what is the detriment. <br /> <br />City Engineer Tim I-limmeI' does not see any detriment right now to this. <br /> <br />Steve Young, 3844 York Avenue, Minneapolis wanted to explain that he is proposing to solve a <br />long term problem to this area and run. this pipe all the way down. <br /> <br />City Engineer Himmel' wanted to add that Mr. Young's desire is not to be out the full portion of <br />his cost. <br /> <br />rvIayor Ramsey. asked for City Administrator Kurt Ulrich's perspective on this. <br /> <br />City Administrator Kurt Ulrich responded by stating this site is important to the City and it is a. <br />potential area to the Armstrong interchange, For the long term it will add the most value to the <br />property to get the project done. <br /> <br />Mayor Ramsey mentioned the possibility of the interchange in the future and with that is not sure <br />if he wants to go, through with the cost of oversizing the pipe. <br /> <br />City Administrntor K1.~rt Ulrich explained that interchanges also need ponding and that is typical <br />why. a bridge or new asph~tlt is put in for a road project that also needs to be ponded. This is an <br />opportunity, . <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Ramsey, seconded by Councilmember McGlone to recommend to City <br />Council selection of Opti()n 2 per staff s recommendation. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Dehen, Mayor Ramsey, Councilmember McGlone. <br />Voting No:" None. Absent: Councilmember Elvig <br />, <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Consider a Request for the County to Install a Crosswall( at the Intersection <br />of 161slAvenue and Armstrong Blvd N'W <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Steve Jankowski explained that staff waS contacted by Mr. Pat Surma <br />who resides at 7930 161 sl Lane with a number of s\.~ggestions of improving the safety of the <br />intersection which. consists of four elements of placing a crosswalk at the intersection on <br />Armstrong Boulevard, Those elements are 1) Place a crosswalk across Armstrong Boulevard 2) <br />Add a second Stop sign on the west leg of this intersection 3) Clear brush on the west leg of the <br />intersection to improve visibility of the existing stop sign 4) Place a Dashing yellow light at the <br />requested crosswalk to add extra emphasis for it. With Armstrong Boulevard being in the <br />jurisdiction of Anoka County Highway Department the City can only make a written request to <br />consider these things, and that is staff's recommendation for doing. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / April 21, 2009 <br />. Pnge 4 of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.