My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 11/17/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2009
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 11/17/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:27:53 PM
Creation date
1/12/2010 11:17:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
11/17/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilmember Dehen asked why non-residents were being charged for emergency services. He <br />noted no-fault coverage picked up the expense and he believed both residents and non-residents <br />should be charged. <br /> <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he liked the idea of exempting the residents because the residents were <br />already paying for emergency services through taxes. <br /> <br />Councilmembers Wise, McGlone, and Elvig agreed with Mayor Ramsey. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGlone asked when did the change take affect and what were the criteria. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler responded fire rescue did not respond on every accident if there were no <br />injuries. However, if fire rescue was dispatched even if there were no injuries, there would be a <br />charge. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated Council had given staff a directive to come up with revenue <br />generating sources. He noted he was okay to charge fees for actual costs expended, but he did <br />not want fees charged just for the purpose of raising revenue. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler stated he wanted to educate the residents and normally the first time the <br />Department went out for illegal burning, the Department gave a warning, but if the Department <br />had to go out again, the"fine could be imposed. <br /> <br />It was Council's consensus that with a first time burning violation, a warning letter would go out <br />to the residence. If the Fire Department goes out a second time for a burning violation, the fine <br />could be imposed. The fine would be imposed on the property and not the resident. However, it <br />was up to the discretion of the Fire Department if the Department felt it was necessary to issue a <br />fine on a first time burning violation. The start date for the fine would be April 1, 2010. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wise questioned the increase in liquor licensing fee. <br /> <br />Staff will research the liquor licensing fee further and report back to Council. <br /> <br />2) Water Conservation Toolbox <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson reviewed the staff report. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen suggested adding information on weed control and invasive species at <br />some point in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig suggested before this web site went public that a link be sent to Council for <br />their suggestions and recommendations. <br /> <br />Council's consensus was they liked the proposed website and thanked the Committee for their <br />work on it. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / November 17, 2009 <br />Page 2 of8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.