My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/02/2010
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2010
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/02/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 1:34:38 PM
Creation date
4/12/2010 11:27:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/02/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />submitted. Two got awarded - the rest did not. This project got it because of access <br />control. If we pull out major access closures, it would have to be rescored and we <br />probably would not get the funds. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked where is the cut to Casey's to which Mayor Ramsey replied <br />there is none. Councilmember Dehen asked where it would be if there was one. <br /> <br />Council reviewed the map and talked about different cuts, different options, widening, <br />turn lanes, etc. and asked if we can expand on this plan. <br /> <br />City Engineer Himmer stated that staff asked what would be required to add more but the <br />response was that they want to keep this corridor narrow so there are not as many <br />acquisitions. He added that the potential for widening and adding turn lanes would be at <br />the City's cost. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig asked if we are willing to put in another million dollars to make it <br />a great proj ect. <br /> <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he would not be interested with all that hard channeling. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen suggested we could have the County share in the cost to make it a <br />better project. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson stated we have been working on this project for quite some time and we have <br />had a couple of open house informational meetings on it as well. He thought they may <br />say fine - but it will cost us more for additional right-of-way, more roadway width, etc. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that people do not like u-turns. Traffic will increase on this <br />road and there's already too much. He asked where along this route they would close the <br />road. He stated he is not advocating for a cut on Iodine - that would be more ridiculous; <br />who wants to make this a freeway. Highway #10 is a problem - people are coming down <br />this road because of Highway # 1 O. We will fix the band aid - not the problem. There <br />should have been a fix for Highway #10. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGlone stated we need to talk about other options. The fact is we <br />cannot fix Highway #10 - that's at least ten years out; however, that does not change the <br />fact that we need to do something. The County has come back and changed the plan after <br />comments by this Council. We will look at a $6 million project of money not directly out <br />of the pockets of Ramsey taxpayers. We are on the hook for $450,000. We have to <br />spend that money so spend it on this road. The County will put in some improvements. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson stated that we cannot design this without the County authority - it's their <br />jurisdiction. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session - March 2, 2010 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.