Laserfiche WebLink
I,RRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />July 20, 1988 <br />Page 3 <br />Schrantz agreed to contact Andover constituant Lyle Bradley asking <br />exactly what he would like to see in the way of restrictions on the Rum <br />River. <br />The commission concurred that this issue be tabled until the next <br />meeting. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />1. WMO Operating Procedures. Pearson discussed the procedure for <br />review of the Water Management Plan, pointing out that the first agencies <br />to review the plan would be the four member cities, followed by Anoka <br />County, Metropolitan Council, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department <br />of Natural Resources, the PCA, Health Department, and Board of Water and <br />Soil Resources. Following final adoption of the Water Management Plan, <br />the LRRWMO is then charged with seeing that the plan is followed. <br />Having found that cover letters did not reach member cities along <br />with the Water Management Plan for their review and comment, Pearson <br />agreed to prepare said letters and make them available for distribution <br />under the WMO Secretary's signature. <br />Future project assessment policies were discussed, with Schrantz <br />suggesting that assessments be sent through each city according to a <br />structured engineering formula. Chairman Schrantz also raised the pos- <br />sibility of forming an advisory committee to this WMO. <br />The WMO considered the 1989 -90 budget. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Raatikka, to adopt the same <br />budget for 1989 -90 as was adopted for 1988 -89. All voted yes. Motion <br />carried. <br />Chairman Schrantz recommended that the formula for assessed evalua- <br />tion be reviewed. Weaver noted that said information may be obtained <br />from the City Finance Director. Pearson pointed out that there is no <br />formula set out in the Joint Powers Agreement. Schrantz stated that a <br />formula is outlined on the LRRWMO Member Operating Cost Assessment chart. <br />Mathisen stated that should there be a difference in the assessed valua- <br />tion and formula, then there would be a modification of each community's <br />cost share. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Raatikka, <br />seconded by Weaver, and unanimously carried, that the meeting adjourn at <br />10:30 a.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Mava Mikkonen, Recording Secretary <br />