My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes from 1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
LRRWMO
>
Minutes
>
Minutes from 1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 1:30:50 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 7:53:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Lower Rum River Water Management Organization
Document Date
11/28/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />November 28, 1990 <br />Page 4 <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />1. Update of the LRRWMO Joint Powers Agreement <br />Legal adviser Curt Pearson was unable to attend this meeting. <br />Therefore, this item will be held over to the December <br />meeting. <br />2. Water Quality Management Plan - Define Regional Ponding <br />Skallman provided an outline of steps recommended to be <br />undertaken in defining and identifying water bodies to be <br />protected during the water quality planning process. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Erickson, DIRECTING <br />THE CONSULTING ENGINEER TO DRAFT A LETTER, UNDER THE VICE - <br />CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE, TO EACH MEMBER CITY, ANOKA COUNTY, THE <br />METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL <br />RESOURCES, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, AND THE MINNESOTA SOIL AND <br />WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ASKING WHICH, IF ANY, OF THE <br />BODIES OF WATER WITHIN OUR WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION IS <br />OF PARTICULAR INTEREST AND CONCERN TO THEM. A MAP DESIGNA- <br />TING THE LOWER RUM RIVER WMO'S BOUNDARIES SHALL ACCOMPANY <br />EACH LETTER. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Skallman went on to explain how the LRRWMO municipalities can <br />determine whether proposed projects will have adequate <br />natural ponding facilities through the use of area wetlands <br />or whether additional sedimentation ponds will be required, <br />still taking into account the type of runoff generated from <br />each project. Land use is an issue that should be taken into <br />account when the cities and LRRWMO review projects. <br />Raatikka noted at a recent seminar he attended one WMO <br />adopted an existing manual on water quality as part of its <br />plan. Skallman did not agree with that practice as a whole, <br />but rather suggested language could be used referencing <br />compliance with normal erosion control practices as listed in <br />a given manual(s). <br />Members and Skallman went on to discuss the responsibilities <br />of the cities in determining the water bodies or areas of <br />specific concern in terms of water quality planning. <br />Skallman indicated if the LRRWMO plans to implement the Water <br />Quality Guidelines by the next construction season, this <br />water quality planning process should proceed prior to that <br />time frame. While the city plans may not be in conformance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.