My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes from 1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
LRRWMO
>
Minutes
>
Minutes from 1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 1:30:50 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 7:53:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Lower Rum River Water Management Organization
Document Date
11/28/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />March 21, 1990 <br />Page 3 <br />ID and comments and report back at the next meeting. Skallman <br />agreed to check with other watersheds to see what comments <br />they received from the PCA. <br />Raatikka stated the individual cities' plans will have the <br />more detailed review. Weaver agreed many of these are items <br />specific to the individual cities which they should respond <br />to rather than having the LRRWMO spend money on them. The <br />cities should then communicate to the LRRWMO letting them <br />know that the particular issue or issues have been addressed. <br />Skallman concurred that these comments seemed excessively <br />detailed compared to what other organizations have received. <br />Skallman was also directed to determine which of these items <br />should be addressed by the watershed and which should be <br />addressed by the local communities, including the costs of <br />doing some of this things should it become mandatory. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Raatikka, DIRECTING <br />SKALLMAN TO REVIEW THE POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY COMMENTS ON <br />THE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, INVESTIGATE FURTHER, AND REPORT <br />BACK AT THE NEXT MEETING AS INDICATED DURING DISCUSSION. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />Barr Engineering Fee Schedule <br />The commission reviewed the updated fee schedule for Barr <br />Engineering's services. Skallman stated these costs are <br />fairly typical in comparison to other firms. He added his <br />superiors authorized a 26 1/2 cent mileage charge, which is <br />used by the Federal government now; but because of bookkeep- <br />ing costs, they propose to write off the $25 per year mileage <br />costs on the December billing. <br />Motion was made by Mathisen, seconded by Weaver, to CONTINUE <br />USING THE SERVICES OF BARR ENGINEERING AT THEIR EXISTING FEE <br />SCHEDULE FOR ANOTHER YEAR BUT LETTING THEM KNOW WE ARE <br />CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR PRICES. IN ADDITION, THE LRRWMO WILL <br />ACCEPT THE PROPOSED 26 1/2 CENT PER MILE MILEAGE COST WITH <br />SAID CHARGES WRITTEN OFF IN THE AMOUNT OF $25.00 ON THE <br />DECEMBER BILLING, AS REQUESTED. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Summary of February 21 Joint Councils Meeting <br />The commission discussed the February 21, 1990, 7:00 p.m. <br />joint meeting with the member city councils. Concerns <br />expressed during the joint meeting relative to the potential <br />confusion of the way the LRRWMO classifies waters in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.