My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes from 1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
LRRWMO
>
Minutes
>
Minutes from 1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 1:31:00 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 9:00:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Lower Rum River Water Management Organization
Document Date
12/19/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />October 16, 1991 <br />Page 6 <br />Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Weaver, to ROLL OVER <br />THE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNT, WHICH MATURES OCTOBER 25, <br />1991, CONTINGENT ON NO OUTSTANDING BILLS. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />Erickson indicated September financial activity shows the <br />receipt of the second half membership dues from the City of <br />Anoka. All member cities are now paid up for this year. <br />Erickson noted there is one outstanding bill in the amount of <br />$1,690.60 from Barr Engineering dated June 21, 1991. He <br />recalled the board requested additional detail /breakdown from <br />Skallman prior to payment. No further information has yet <br />been received from Barr. <br />Schrantz noted said bill update was sent to his office at <br />Andover City Hall. <br />The billing detail was reviewed, with Weaver noting two <br />project charges, Lord of Life Church and Kobs Addition, <br />should be taken out of the project fees. <br />Schultz queried what Barr Engineering rates this board should <br />be paying, that of the engineer or the secretarial staff. As <br />for setting up a system for maintenance, as listed under <br />administration, Schultz stated he has a problem paying for <br />their overhead charges. He also felt the engineer should be <br />keeping a more detailed record of phone calls charged to this <br />board. These calls should be tied to and charged to a <br />specific project with payment taken out of said project fee. <br />Schrantz concurred the calls should be broken down further. <br />Weaver concurred this board should not pay for the prepara- <br />tion of this billing or Barr's organizational files. <br />Jankowski concurred adding that should be their overhead <br />expenses built into the engineer's rates this board is <br />paying. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Jankowski, to RETURN <br />THIS BILL $1,690.60 TO BARR ENGINEERING AND INDICATE IT IS <br />THE REACTION OF THIS BOARD WE SHOULD NOT BE BILLED FOR THE <br />PREPARATION OF THE DETAILED BILLING. THE HOURLY CHARGE <br />APPEARS TO BE BEYOND THE ENGINEER'S $65.00 PER HOUR SUBMITTED <br />IN AGREEMENT WITH BARR ENGINEERING. FURTHER WE REQUEST A <br />DETAILED TIME ANALYSIS AND TELEPHONE LOG SHOWING THE DATE OF <br />CALLS, TO WHOM HE SPOKE, AND THE TIME SPENT ON EACH CALL. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.