Minutes from 1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Special LRRWMO Meeting Minutes September 22, 1992 Page 3 leeway time. Schrantz noted that of the $500 application fee, $50 is automatically set aside for administrative fees, leaving a $450 maximum for project review costs, as previously discussed. Knutson indicated he could call Skallman and /or whoever is involved when a project expendi- ture reaches the $400 point. Weaver and Jankowski agreed to withdraw their respective motion and second. The board concurred that a degree of reason and common sense must be exercised with regard to project review and related expenditures. However, Skallman should notify- the board and /or the appropriate member city LRRWMO representative before a project runs out of money. Said LRRWMO member will then contact the project applicant and, in the future, collect another $500. However, to get the present overages up to date, the exact amounts needed per project will be collected by the appropriate LRRWMO representative. Upon discussion of the breakdown of engineering bills, Knutson presented the Treasurer's Report for the period ending August 31, 1992, noting how the engineering expenses are broken down. Also noted on the summary page of the report were balances in the money market checking account of $10.00, interest bearing savings account of $4,981.41 less a $1,486.00 permit account balance, leaving a $3,495.41 balance in the savings account; and a certificate of deposit account of $12,000.00; for a current balance of $16,991.41. Knutson queried whether the board approved engineering expen- ditures for review of the Andover Water Management Plan. Schrantz indicated it has been approved; adding that each city is required to do its own plan, and the watershed is required to approve it. He stated the board could have each city pay for the engineering review of its own plan, and reiterated the rule by which this board has been operating: If you use LRRWMO services, you pay for us. The board concurred. Knutson noted that so far Knutson has put in four hours on the review of the Andover plan, amounting to $280.00. Schultz indicated the City of Anoka previously hired Barr Engineering to prepare its Water Management Plan. Schrantz reiterated that each city's plan has to be consistent with the LRRWMO's plan. Knutson indicated when all engineering review bills are in he would send the City of Andover a bill for the Sonsteby project and review of the Andover Water Management Plan.