Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />August 20, 1992 <br />Page 8 <br />this board should be quite simple, and the board itself can <br />probably put together such an agreement. He stated the <br />board's next step is to advertise for consultants according <br />to state statute requirements. Schrantz added the contract <br />should include the Consultant Engineer's review of DNR and <br />LRRWMO permit applications. <br />Schrantz indicated this board might want to consider request- <br />ing a lump sum charge for coning to these regular monthly <br />meetings for the length of each meeting. <br />Schrantz stated this board will want its Consulting Engineer <br />to attend these wetland Technical Review Committee reviews <br />also. He added each individual who uses our Consulting <br />Engineer on these matters will pay for the cost. Schultz <br />queried why a permit did not come through for the Sonsteby <br />project with the $500 application fee submitted. Schrantz <br />noted that this procedure is young; we might decide to handle <br />things differently as we proceed. <br />The board members concurred that according to state statute <br />the LRRWMO will have to invite proposals for engineering <br />services. <br />Joint Powers Agreement Discussions <br />Weaver queried whether the LRRWMO must update its Joint <br />Powers Agreement. Schrantz responded that our attorney has <br />advised this board to do so according to state statute. It <br />was noted that $3,500 has been budgeted for legal fees to <br />update the Joint Powers Agreement. Schrantz reported the <br />attorney has indicated he could probably do the work for <br />approximately $2,000 to $2,500. <br />Weaver noted that everytime the state legislature meets <br />changes are made which affect the Joint Powers Agreement. He <br />queried whether other WMO's have upgraded their documents to <br />comply with recent legislation. Schrantz felt it should not <br />make any difference if other's have updated theirs or not. <br />Weaver added he is not terribly excited about have the LRRWMO <br />Joint Powers Agreement updated at this time. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Ottensman, to TABLE <br />FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF UPDATING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT <br />AT THIS TIME. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes. Motion carried. <br />