Laserfiche WebLink
LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />July 15, 1993 <br />Page 14 <br />will fill the pond up. They are proposing a twelve-inch <br />emergency overflow pipe to the pond. Beduhn indicated he <br />discussed this proposed project with Barr Engineering Vice <br />President John Dickson who reportedly concurred with his <br />findings: this is not the proper way to design a basin. <br />Jankowski felt one of the main issues to be considered is <br />whether this board will allow previously created ponds on <br />another site to be used to mitigate wetlands. Such activity <br />will, in essence, be a retroactive banking situation. <br />Jankowski asked the board to keep in mind that under the <br />rules a developer can fill in one location and compensate in <br />another area within this WMO jurisdiction. The question is <br />should we allow retroactive banking; and, if so, how far back <br />should it be allowed. <br />Beduhn queried whether the pond when it was constructed was <br />intended for future mitigation loss. He suggested BWSR might <br />have specific thoughts on such a situation. <br />Beduhn indicated he would prefer to see information on <br />basement or walkout structures. He stated he does not agree <br />with the way the flood level was determined or the 100-year <br />flood level. He contended that is not the correct flood <br />elevation. <br />Jankowski stated he has the basement elevations and knows the <br />applicant also has that information available. He reiterated <br />the larger issue is whether the applicant will be able to <br />utilize the pond as mitigation. <br />Upon discussion of the Wetland Conservation Act regulations, <br />Beduhn indicated the Local Governmental Units (LGU's) can <br />operate under the interim rules until December 31, 1993. <br />Upon further discussion of the pond/mitigation issue, <br />Jankowski stated the pond has been in existence for approxi- <br />mately one year, but the hole has been dug for two years. <br />Weaver felt this board should attempt to be reasonable in its <br />approach to this pond/mitigation issue. The applicant has <br />evidently previously provided a wetland to replace this one. <br />He suggested we not place a road block in the way of this <br />development: However, he did query the Ramsey represen- <br />tatives's thoughts. <br />Jankowski indicated he concurred with that position. <br />However, he did expressed some concern about setting a <br />precedent on long term retroactive banking. <br />