Minutes from 1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

LRRWMO Meeting Minutes September 15, 1994 Page 4 Schultz questioned the status of several projects (#91-4 Vo-Tec and 92-1 Mobile Oil) which he believed were final. The secretary was asked to review the permit file notify Knutson of their status. A brief discussion was held regazding the best procedure to final a project and refund remaining permit fee to the applicant. It was noted that a final recommendation from Beduhn is needed on projects involving wetland restoration, however, City engineers are able to final projects involving sedimentation pond construction. -This information will be included on the quarterly report which will trigger authorization to Knutson to make the refund. Consensus so reached. PENDING PROJECTS/PERMIT REVIEWS LRRWMO #93-08 -Wood Pond Hills 4th Addition Revision - Ramsev Jankowski reviewed the Wood Pond Hills 1st through 4th Additions, noting that the DNR has amended their Permit #94-6030 authorizing appropriation of water for construction dewatering purposes in Wood Pond. Hills 4th Addition. The amendment reflects that dewatering will occur in the 4th Addition of Wood Pond Hills rather than within the 3rd addition. Informational; no action required LRRWMO #93-13 -Shoal Removal Plans for Rum River Bridge -Anoka Jankowski reviewed Beduhn's memo dated September 14, 1994 indicating his recommendation that a floatation silt curtain may be appropriate to prevent downstream impacts and allow disturbed sediment to be captured and removed. If a flotation silt curtain is not feasible, he advises the applicant should make every effort to contain the area of disturbance. Jankowski reviewed that Beduhn specifically comments that the applicant should consider the flood level impact assuming the boat channel fills with sediment and the floodplain fill remains in-place, and questions whether the dredging of material at the base of the Main Street Bridge will promote bridge scour and compromise the integrity of the bridge. Schultz advised that Anoka, according to State law, checks the bridge every year for bridge scour. Haas questioned the need to obtain a conditional use permit from the City of Anoka before the DNR considers approval of the permit. Schultz reviewed a portion of the Anoka City Charter indicating a conditional use permit is not required for public projects.