Laserfiche WebLink
b ~ <br />LRRWMO Meeting Minutes <br />July 21, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />The term of investment and anticipated expenditures was next discussed. Consensus was <br />reached to allow the Deputy Treasurer to determine the term length of the certificates of <br />deposit based on anticipated expenditures. <br />PAYMENT OF BILLS <br />Knutson presented three bills for payment as follows: Timesaver Off Site Secretarial for <br />$218.18, Barr Engineering for $553.50 ($207 for administrative costs which includes <br />attendance at the May meeting) and City of Anoka for $132.42. It was noted the bills were <br />reviewed by the Bill Committee and they recommend approval. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Haas, to authorize payment to Timesaver Off <br />Site Secretarial for $218.18, Barr Engineering for $553.50 and City of Anoka for $132.42, <br />as presented. Vote: 3 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried. <br />Haas reported that Larry Schalo has requested reimbursement of his remaining permit fee. <br />It was noted that Beduhn has determined Schalo is working in a protected DNR wetland <br />and was given exemption. <br />Knutson pointed out that the June bill from Barr Engineering has not yet been received. <br />Haas explained that while an exemption has been approved, the LRRWMO may want <br />Beduhn to inspect the project, once completed, to assure the area outside the protected <br />wetland has not been disturbed. Jankowski agreed. <br />Motion was made by Weaver, seconded by Haas, to table further consideration of <br />reimbursement of Schalo's permit f'ee until the August 18, 1994 meeting when the final <br />charges from Barr Engineering can be determined. Vote: 3 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried. <br />1995 BUDGET INFORMATION <br />Knutson reviewed a budget analysis he prepared indicating actual budgets since 1989. He <br />explained the LRRWMO will need to consider budget amounts for 1995 so member cities <br />can be notified of their portion. <br />Jankowski reviewed estimated costs for the Plan update through Phase 5. He noted that this <br />estimate may increase if more public hearings need to scheduled. Schultz commented that <br />each member city may want to schedule a public hearing in their own community so <br />residents can attend in a location they are familiar with. <br />The Board discussed how much should be budgeted in 1995 for the Plan update and whether <br />existing reserves should be depleted. The comment was made that if the Challenge Grant <br />is received, about $6,000 would need to be budgeted to complete Phases 1-4. <br />