Minutes from 1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

LRRWMO Meeting Minutes May 18, 1995 Page 8 Moved by Schultz, seconded by Ferguson, to approve LRRWMO Permit #95-9, First Team Sports to construct a 205,000 square foot corporate headquarters/warehouse/distribution facility in the Anoka Enterprise Park subject to review and approval by Barr Engineering. Vote: 4 ayes, 0 nays. Motion carried. Discuss Plan Update -Data Assessment/Goals & Policies Mark Lobenneier, SEH, reviewed the editing format and process used to "redline" omissions and "highlight" additions to the language. With regard to the actual Statute language, Lobermeier advised it will be up to the LRRWMO whether it remains in the final document. Consensus was reached to retain the Statute quotes throughout the review process to provide ease of understanding. Lobermeier asked how the LRRWMO wants to review the Plan (page-by-page/section-by- section). Schultz suggested the review information be submitted to members ahead of time to provide adequate time for review and consideration. Then it can be discussed at the meeting. Ferguson stated he is satisfied with the process used by 6 Cities where the information is reviewed ahead of time and discussed at the meeting with each member bringing up other issues of interest to them. At the next meeting, the revisions are reviewed and then they move to the next chapter. Lobermeier and the LRRWMO proceeded to review the Land and Water Resources Inventory. Lobenneier suggested they prepare a set design storm criteria which will put the "why" behind the plan. He asked if members are comfortable with the two-storm approach in lieu of critical event criteria contained in the current Plan. It was noted that Storm Distnbution, Flood Evaluation Storms, Section 4, indicates "The second FES: 100-year return period, 10-day runoff event using a Type C mass curve as identified in SCS Natural Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology (NEH-4)". Lobermeier explained that you probably would not design a system for this event but the design should indicate whether a house should be raised to avoid a flooding problem. Haas advised that Coon Creek's Plan requires system designs to accommodate two 100-year back-to-back storms. Lobenneier believed it is unlikely that two back-to-back 100-year events would occur within a 48 hour time period. He stated he will contact Tim Kelly, Coon Creek Watershed, about their standard. Consensus was reached to look at including design storm and critical storm language. Lobermeier noted the Plan requires inclusion of the Land Use Plans. Schultz indicated he does use the existing land use map in the current Plan.